Just like I posted on social media yesterday, I’m starting to like Steno Imperium’s alarmist style. It’s similar to my own in that it says what needs to be said in a way that is, in my view, very alternative to our mainstream culture and, in its own way, artistic. Even though the new age is one of instant gratification and short-form content, the writer takes the time to dive deep into the message. The value of that can’t go unsung.

I’m still in the process of processing it all, but among the most surprising claims is that the starting point of 60,000 court reporters used by many organizations is false or that there is no evidence of it.

Well, I’m not going to take too much thunder from my fellow writer. Go check out some of the information and infographics. If anyone can get their hands on a copy of this alleged 1993 document, please send it over to contact@stenonymous.com or comment below. Crowdsourcing information has done well for us so far. I don’t think we should stop now.

And thank you, Steno Imperium. In my wildest dreams, I never could’ve imagined that original 60,000 number I’ve seen floating around could be made up. Maybe that’s always been my problem, too gullible and trusting.

My favorite quote? “Once you’ve got missing or incomplete transcripts, you might as well kiss your appeal goodbye.”

Till next time.