Motion to Resign Keith Lemons Gathering Supporters After National Court Reporters Association Strong Committee Disbanded

It’s a holiday, so I’m not going to take up too much of your time. NCRA Members are being encouraged by former Strong members to stand up against what has been done. I’m in full support, so these materials have a home here. I regret no longer having my membership. But just let it be known that I’d be first to sign.

Spread ’em around to fellow NCRA members. If nothing else, it’ll be interesting to see how the institutional machinery attempts to wiggle out of this one.

Years ago I would’ve wept at the sight of such division. Now I consider it wholly necessary for the advancement of our interests as a community. NCRA needs to understand — and needs to communicate that it understands — that it exists to serve our interests. The mission in the bylaws is leadership and enlightenment. Real leaders don’t toss away their strongest supporters.

And those that do will answer for it.

Dropboxed.

Uploaded to Stenonymous:

Images:

Words Per Minute Episode 1 Transcript

I contracted with stenographic service MGR Reporting shortly after the conclusion of the Words Per Minute Podcast Episode 1. MGR’s got me a transcript. It is available for download.

Experimental idea. Perhaps we can hire multiple transcribers and see if their transcripts are objectively better or worse. Donations that come in today and tomorrow will be dedicated to that purpose as long as we get at least $100.

Obviously, such a small sample size is almost meaningless, but then again, the Speech-to-Text Institute was going to upend our entire field on much less solid argument. And I was able to upend them with the power of one. So maybe small sample sizes can still have big results.

Below is a plain text version.

MR. DAY: I’m going to make a

               ...backup audio just in case.  

DIGITAL COURT REPORTER: Yeah. Do

for that. So will I.

MR. DAY: So we'll have three

backups, so we're good.

DIGITAL COURT REPORTER: All

right. And it's also rec --

MR. DAY: Yeah.

DIGITAL COURT REPORTER: So, are

you ready?

MR. DAY: Yeah.

DIGITAL COURT REPORTER: Okay.

Don't be afraid. Welcome to Words per Minute.

This is the inaugural episode. This is everything,

all things about court reporting. I'm with my

co-host, Christopher Day. How are you?

MR. DAY: I'm good. How you

doing?

DIGITAL COURT REPORTER: I'm good.

We'll get into a whole situation and my name is

(censored). I can't name it because I currently

work for a service that supplies depositions, and

hopefully maybe one day I could reveal who I am,

but today I am (censored). That's how we're doing
                                                          2



               it today.  Sound good?  

                                MR. DAY:  We call them big boxes.  

               Yeah, that sounds good to me.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah.  

               I'll just be an unnamed reporter that can talk 

               about (censored) whenever I can.  So  But let's 

               just talk about how we combine forces.  I met 

               Christopher on the internet.  He runs the website 

               -- go ahead, you could say what it is.  So you -- 

               so everyone --

                                MR. DAY:  Stenonymous.com.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  

               Stenonymous.com.  And I was thinking about, you 

               know, the more that I started learning about court 

               reporting, I started realizing that I don't know 

               anything.  So I decided to reach out to you, and 

               you weren't sure where my intentions were at the 

               same time.  Not that I was being evil, or anything, 

               it was just --

                                MR. DAY:  I think I was pretty 

               open.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah, you 

               were.  And you were trying to feel people out, so 

               that's where we were.  So I'm interested to hear 

               what your story is, but I also thought as we have 
                                                          3



               gotten to know each other, I realized that I think 

               you would be more potent because now, you know, the 

               long form of writing is not getting the influence 

               that it once was.  And I think video and podcasts 

               are something that is moving the needle, and maybe 

               you'll be able to get your point across.  So I 

               think for me personally, and maybe probably for 

               you, is to just get more exposure, and just try to 

               see if we can get more prominence in this business 

               that we -- both you and I love, right?  

                                MR. DAY:  Absolutely.  Yeah.  I'm 

               all for it.  I mean, I've made the longhand writing 

               work as much as it's going to work, and I'm eager 

               to see what this is like in a podcast format.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah.  

               Very excited to speak to you.  So I just wanted to 

               talk about how you got into this whole racket.  I 

               mean, this is not something that somebody wakes up 

               and says, "You know what, I want to be in the 

               courtroom in a murder trial, and I want to be the 

               one that writes all of the words word for word."  

               That's not -- it's kind of something that you 

               stumble in by accident, and I think through my 

               trials and tribulations, and just my journey to the 

               road to success, I've realized that a lot of people 
                                                          4



               have said, you know, their parents were in it.  

               Somebody else in my family was in the court.  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  And they 

               kind of just -- kind of stumbled upon it after, you 

               know, doing a myriad of different things.  How did 

               you get your start in court reporting?  

                                MR. DAY:  So I was this super 

               introverted high school kid.  And I saw it in a 

               high school fair, and I had no idea what I wanted 

               to do with my life.  You know, I knew I wasn't 

               coordinated enough to do like food service and 

               stuff like that.  So I came up on senior year and 

               people were like, "What are you going do with your 

               life, what are you going to do with your life?"  

               I'm like, "I don't know.  Court reporting school.  

               I saw it in the high school Fair." 

                                So I set up with this school and I 

               took to it almost immediately.  I really practiced 

               hard.  There're three forms of court reporting; 

               there's stenography, there's voice writing, and 

               there's digital court reporting.  And so, I took 

               the stenographic route.  And at that point in 

               history, that was really the main route.  So  And 

               that's it.  I mean, I got hooked up with the -- it 
                                                          5



               was called New York Career Institute at the time, 

               and they later sold themselves to Plaza College in 

               Queens, and the rest is history.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah.  

               Very interesting.  So, just to piggyback of what 

               you're saying, you're into the stenography part.  I 

               still have the ability to advance to that, but I've 

               also thought about my moment in time of the digital 

               reporting thing of trying to master that aspect of 

               it.  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  What I do 

               like about it as opposed to what you're doing is 

               that you are kind of in the courthouse day to day 

               when things are happening.  And you know, that's a 

               great place to be.  I know my other line of work, 

               I'm able to, you know, be out and about and see all 

               the people and kind of get those networks and, you 

               know, really is able to be part of the community.  

               Me, it's, the digital part is interesting because 

               you're not necessarily meeting the people that's 

               giving you feedback.  There's not necessarily 

               people giving you the right way of doing things.  

               You just kind of learn and then you go, oh, yeah, 

               okay.  You get the feedback later on in an e-mail.  
                                                          6



               So it's a lot more informal.  And it's kind of like 

               learn as you go.  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  But I'll 

               tell you just for me, somebody saw me type and they 

               were like, "Wow, you should be a stenographer."  

               And I, you know, I've always seen it from just 

               watching TV, or TV shows --

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  -- of 

               people that are being stenographers, and you could 

               see that -- okay, they could type very fast.  And I 

               always saw that they weren't using a normal like 

               laptop, or a computer.  They were using some sort 

               of weird machine.  I would imagine that's a Steno 

               machine, right?  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  We call it a 

               Steno machine.  I think you can call it a 

               Stenotype.  Some people call it a Stenograph, but 

               that's technically a company name.  So yeah,   

               Steno machine.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Right.  

               So, you know, going back to my situation after 

               somebody saw that, I got a hold of an ad saying 

               that if you, you know, if you're really good at 
                                                          7



               just being professional, just being able to type 

               quickly, there's going to go a couple of steps and 

               then you could be a digital court reporter.  Now, 

               little did I know the world that I was going to 

               join in because I didn't know, you know, where we 

               fit in.  I guess the tension that you had between 

               --

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  People 

               that are in the conventional world.  And that's why 

               I was able to, you know, really get a bond with you 

               because you taught me a lot of just the 

               differences.  I had no idea, and I often think that 

               seldom somebody, a stenographer like you, and a 

               digital reporter like me don't necessarily 

               communicate.  So I don't know what's going on in 

               your world, and you probably don't know what's 

               really going on in my world, even though you do 

               extensive research on synonymous.  But we're going 

               --

                                MR. DAY:  Yup.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  -- to get 

               to know a lot of different things that have been 

               going on.  So we're going to find out what really 

               it entails.  And, you know, I really think that we 
                                                          8



               will be able to shine light to a lot of things that 

               are happening in the court reporting industry, as 

               well as trying to influence maybe people to get, 

               you know, more of traction of people wanting to do 

               this.  

                                But, you know, after you found 

               your footing and you went to school, you know, just 

               talk about the steps of like what it's like to get 

               to where you're at, which is, you know, a 

               courthouse.  How do you get to that?  

                                MR. DAY:  So for me personally, I 

               graduated school and we graduated 225 words a 

               minute.  And at that point, your kind of -- I would 

               say it's kind of like you're saying, there's less 

               guidance.  You don't really know exactly how things 

               are going to go.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Mm-hmm 

               (affirmative).  

                                MR. DAY:  And you hook up with one 

               of these court reporting agencies and they 

               generally hire you as an independent contractor.  

               Side note, I've done some workers rights research, 

               and we may not actually be independent contractors, 

               but that's a whole different story.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah, 
                                                          9



               we'll get into that.  That's another entirely 

               different --

                                MR. DAY:  We'll get into that.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yup.  

                                MR. DAY:  But anyway, so I'm 

               taking depositions probably just like you.  Well, I 

               think you do a lot more remote than I got to do.  

               At the point I did, it was more 2010 to 2014, and 

               the depositions at that point in time were 

               basically all in person, you know?  So it was a lot 

               of running around the city, they used to hold 

               depositions in the Bronx Courthouse.  

                                So I went into the -- you would 

               laugh at it actually.  It was this big wide room 

               with just -- I want to say like nine tables set up, 

               or maybe six tables set up.  And everybody's just 

               having a different deposition at each different 

               table.  So it was, you know, it was kind of chaotic 

               like that.  It was kind of like wild west, you have 

               no idea what you're walking into.  The attorneys, 

               you know, might be combative with each other, or 

               they might be the nicest people in the world, and 

               it was just this mixed bag, and kind of learning 

               the ropes the hard way.  

                                And then at some point, a friend 
                                                         10



               of mine said, "You should go do grand jury in 

               Manhattan.  They're hiring."  And Grand jury is, 

               you're working for the district attorney as a grand 

               jury court reporter.  And as of now, the ones in 

               New York City only takes stenographers, I think.  

               By law I think they have to use stenographers.  And 

               basically, I do grand jury for a little bit.  I 

               leave that line of work.  And then the next thing I 

               know, I'm back in this freelance world.  And I 

               wasn't really enjoying it at that point, it wasn't 

               paying me enough.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Mm-hmm 

               (affirmative).  

                                MR. DAY:  And they had the civil 

               service test to become a court reporter for the 

               courts.  So I said, "All right, I'll go take that."  

               Sit for that test, I placed 14th in the State for 

               that test.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Wow.  

                                MR. DAY:  And the rest, like I 

               said, is history.  I started up with the Brooklyn 

               Criminal Court and, you know, at this point, I've 

               seen every, you know, most of the spots of our 

               criminal justice system.  I've seen the grand jury 

               where felonies get indicted, I've seen Brooklyn 
                                                         11



               Criminal Court, which is all misdemeanors and 

               stuff, and now I'm in Supreme Court, which is all 

               felonies and felony trials.  So I've really -- I've 

               lived quite a life and gotten to see a lot through 

               this job.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  That's 

               amazing.  That sounds like a whole myriad of 

               different experiences.  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Does it 

               take an emotional toll when you are, you know, I 

               think when you're in the room with people that, you 

               know, their lives are at the fate of a jury and a 

               judge, and you're just there typing away verbatim 

               of what's happening?  I suppose you can't help but 

               get swept up into, you know, people's situations 

               and just how crazy it is that you're just there.  

               You're a fly on the wall.  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  I mean, so 

               there's different schools of thought and there's 

               people who in our field who are just like, "No, 

               don't even think about it.  Just do your job."  And 

               I respect that view.

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Right.  

                                MR. DAY:  But I really do take it 
                                                         12



               seriously.  And I think about, you know, even the 

               tiniest little transcript can end up in, you know, 

               New York State's highest court, the court of 

               appeals.  And it can change the law.  And so, you 

               really have to kind of think about, you know, not 

               only is this someone's life, but this may go on to 

               impact other people's lives.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Right.  

                                MR. DAY:  So you'd better get it 

               right.  Because, you know, and that's the wonderful 

               thing about the job, is we don't have to make those 

               hard decisions, we don't have to make those calls, 

               so we're kind of removed from the feeling of, you 

               know, being the person who's putting this person in 

               this situation.  Although there's also an argument 

               to be heard and some people feel this way, they put 

               themselves in that situation.  I don't really, you 

               know, I think it's a case-by-case basis, and we 

               just have to trust the system to kind of work it 

               out.  But I do think about the impact that our work 

               has on people, and I think it's pretty important.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah, 

               it's got to be.  I just know for me, I do it in the 

               State of New York --

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  
                                                         13



                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  -- and, 

               you know, sometimes I'll get somebody that is like 

               a big wig in the department of whatever it is, and 

               I'm just like, I can't believe this is happening, 

               and I'm here.  And, you know, you just have that 

               sense of -- it's one of those things where you are 

               the fly on the wall, but you are involved, but 

               you're not involved.  So I completely understand 

               the nature of it in which that you are saying.  But 

               I feel like I haven't gotten emotionally involved, 

               but how could you not get swept away about what's 

               happening, because sometimes this is like 

               irreparable damage.  

                                I know for me, recently, September 

               1st, 2022, has been a big bone of contention.  That 

               specific date.  It was the same day when there was 

               a lot of flooding in New York State, and it was 

               Hurricane Ida.  So I constantly hear about somebody 

               lost a piece of their backyard, and now they're 

               suing, you know, the town that they live in because 

               they tried to put an insurance claim and they 

               weren't able to do that.  

                                But, you know, in this particular 

               situation, it was like somebody that just moved in.  

               They were thinking about, you know, how much 
                                                         14



               millions of dollars that they spent, and now 

               they're being affected because they kind of bought 

               something that's a money pit, and they didn't think 

               of it.  And it was only because of a natural 

               disaster.  So I'm interested too because you hear 

               about the emotional stories, but then you're pitted 

               with the legal interpretation of what you should do 

               to adjudicate it.  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  And, you 

               know, I think also people -- sometimes you see 

               people that have been, you know, 30 depositions in.  

               Where they're a supervisor in a specific part, 

               maybe they're in the town of Public works and 

               they're used to having depositions.  Then you got 

               somebody that might be on their bed, they've never 

               been on a deposition before, and they're just 

               acting completely unprofessional.  So

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  One thing 

               I do like about the job is the uniqueness of every 

               day, meaning two different lawyers, different 

               witness.

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  You don't know 

               what you're walking into.  
                                                         15



                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  So you 

               don't know what is going to happen.  It makes it 

               much more interesting than just having a 9:00 to 

               5:00 job.  Do you find that the same way even 

               though you probably are in a trial that's probably 

               going to be a couple of days, couple weeks, couple 

               months long?  

                                MR. DAY:  Well, back when I 

               freelanced, that's exactly how I felt.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah.

                                MR. DAY:  I liked the feeling of 

               having a new thing every day, never knew what I was 

               going to learn that day.  You know, sometimes 

               you're listening to someone talk about, you know, 

               pharmaceutical coding of the pills, you know?  And 

               then sometimes you're listening to, you know, one 

               man was an electrician who got horribly burned, and 

               he was looking for compensation for that.  

                                So it really ran the gamut of 

               things that you could hear about, learn about.  And 

               so -- and that was what made my twist into the 

               criminal court reporting that much more 

               interesting, because criminal, I have to say, is a 

               lot more formulaic, especially the procedural stuff 

               leading up to a trial --
                                                         16



                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Mm-hmm 

               (affirmative).  

                                MR. DAY:  -- it's very similar.   

               It's always like there's an arraignment and then 

               they do some motions.  And for the most part, we're 

               not involved with the motions unless they have a 

               problem.  And then they bring it back to the court 

               and put that on the record, and they'll go back and 

               forth a little bit, and then they'll go to trial.  

               And the trial, like you're saying, is kind of where 

               the magic happens.  Where, you know, you could hear 

               anything.  

                                There was one summation by a 

               prosecutor I had, and she said something like, "To 

               believe the defendant's story, you'd have to 

               believe that magical space unicorns came down and 

               stabbed the victim."

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Oh, boy. 

                                MR. DAY:  Not the victim, the 

               complainant.  And I, you know, you're sitting in a 

               courtroom, you never thought you would hear magical 

               space unicorns, but there I was and I had to type 

               it up.  So

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Well, you 

               haven't seen My Cousin Vinny, that's probably why.  
                                                         17



               You know, you said that type of talk from a 

               prosecutor.  

                                MR. DAY:  I actually saw that 

               movie, and I was very impressed by it.  It's very, 

               you know, it does it in an entertaining way and in 

               a way that's funny, but it brings out a lot of 

               legal principles, and it just does it so 

               masterfully.  So

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah.  

                                MR. DAY:  Anybody that hasn't seen 

               that movie should.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  I agree.  

               Now, since you're at a very high-profile 

               courthouse, obviously, everyone knows the, you 

               know, the New York State Supreme Court, you 

               probably get a lot of high-profile court cases?  

               I'm not asking you to talk about specifics of a 

               specific case, but I am asking you of the 

               high-profile nature and being involved with that.  

               That's got to be very tough to see, because I'm 

               assuming that some people in your personal life 

               kind of ask you about the case, and obviously you 

               have to be mum about it, but do you like being in 

               that celebrity status type of thing, that you know 

               it's getting coverage from a lot of news outlets 
                                                         18



               and a lot of eyes are on it nationwide?  

                                MR. DAY:  You know, it's really 

               interesting because the high-profile stuff I 

               generally don't get assigned to.  But I definitely, 

               you know, I know my image has made it on the news 

               before just from being in the courtroom.  So I do 

               kind of like that stuff.  I think it's really cool.  

               I think that -- I wish that the news would cover 

               more of the criminal justice system.  Because I 

               think that there's a lot that goes on that every 

               citizen should know about, and hear about, and just 

               be educated about.  Because there's a lot that 

               people don't know, and there's a lot I didn't know 

               till I made it into the system.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  I also 

               think it's often misinterpreted only because you 

               might see it in one way, and if you're not really 

               in tune with some legal jargon you can kind of get 

               caught up to what's really happening.  So for 

               instance, if there's like a, you know, a summary 

               judgment of X amount of dollars, you don't know 

               what the implications are.  You know, some people 

               could just say, "Okay, well, he's getting sued for 

               50, there's a summary judgment of $50 million on 

               this."  He's not going to pay.  Like, that's just 
                                                         19



               what we're going to boil it down to.  But you don't 

               know what the legal ramifications are until you 

               really get into it.  But --

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  I have a 

               personal question that I have for you.  

                                MR. DAY:  Sure.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  I'm 

               thinking about, you know, doing this remote, I 

               always got to go to the bathroom.  What happens 

               when you got to go to the bathroom and you're 

               typing away, and people are just -- you just don't 

               go -- you just don't drink?

                                MR. DAY:  Generally, try not to 

               drink before you got to go into the courtroom.  If 

               you're having an emergency, then you got to speak 

               up.  You know, that's really all you can do.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  So you've 

               had to go, excuse me, I need a three-minute break.  

               I know, I -- but meanwhile, I'm certain that once 

               the first person speaks up, they're like, "Yeah, I 

               got to go too."

                                MR. DAY:  Oh, yeah.  No.  And I've 

               even had -- I've had lawyers back in the deposition 

               days and I think even in the courtroom occasionally 
                                                         20



               kind of like blame us and be like, "Oh, the court 

               reporter needs a break."  And then -- and meanwhile 

               I didn't ask for a break, but they need the break 

               --

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah.  

                                MR. DAY:  -- so they're like -- 

               yeah.  So sometimes it happens that way.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah.  

                                MR. DAY:  Sometimes it happens 

               where I'll have to speak up.  A lot of times in 

               court depending on how the day is going, they'll 

               either have natural breaks, or they will be calling 

               cases one after the other, and so what you'll do is 

               you'll give someone a heads up, either the judge, 

               or the clerk, like, hey, in between one of these 

               cases, I got to, you know, I need to use the 

               restroom.

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Right.  

                                MR. DAY:  Or whatever it is.  And 

               you got to -- that's one thing that as -- like I 

               said, I was a real introverted kid.  I had to learn 

               to kind of just be upfront about my needs --

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Mm-hmm 

               (affirmative).  

                                MR. DAY:  -- because you can very 
                                                         21



               easily get in a situation where they'll just keep 

               going no matter what your needs are.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  No.  

               Yeah, I've seen that.  I'm just like, "Wow, nobody 

               has -- nobody drank water today?" Like, I don't get 

               it.  Everyone is like Ironman.  And it's always --

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  More like 

               the onus is on you.  You don't want to be the first 

               -- you also don't want to be the first person to 

               break in it.  Like, you don't want to go, excuse 

               me, I got to -- you want to be strong and say like, 

               all right. Let somebody else there.  So that's 

               interesting because I think you've just convinced 

               me, I'm going to be remote forever.  I don't know 

               about all that, I got to go to the bathroom.  

                                MR. DAY:  If you can get remote, I 

               would say do remote.  So I actually have a question 

               for you.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah.  

                                MR. DAY:  At this point are you 

               doing a hundred percent remote?  Because I'm sure I 

               have people listening that want to know.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah.  

               Listen, I think that there's a -- the money isn't 
                                                         22



               as good as what you're doing and what people are 

               doing in the court, but I'm thinking about, let's 

               say if I got into this racket before the pandemic.  

               And obviously the pandemic is what really opened up 

               the floodgates for this to happen, which you have 

               documented chronically on your website.  I'll say 

               that if this wasn't remote, I don't know if this 

               would ever be on my radar, right?  So like once you 

               get used to like working remote, very difficult to 

               get back, very difficult to get back once you're 

               used to it.  

                                Now, at the same time, I have a 

               very plush office situation.  Not only do I have a 

               plush office situation, I have a plus plush studio 

               podcast office situation in another location that's 

               30 yards away.  So for me --

                                MR. DAY:  Wow.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  -- I 

               don't know if it pays because I'm very comfortable 

               here.  I got my family here, got all my equipment 

               here.  Obviously, you could see my Zoom is just as 

               professional.  So for me, I don't know if it's 

               worth going driving to Brooklyn from where I live, 

               which is probably an hour away if we take into 

               account with traffic.  And I think about all of the 
                                                         23



               no-shows that happened for me, where I could be in 

               the courtroom, get there -- try to get there by 

               9:30, and there's a no-show.  That's a waste of a 

               day.  

                                So I think that the decrease in 

               pay for me is worth it because I don't have to go 

               to Brooklyn.  Right?  I don't have to figure out 

               buying food somewhere along the way, and then 

               coming back.  I think for me, it's justified.  And 

               I would rather take the pay cut with the 

               comfortableness that it affords me.  And I also 

               like the fact that you can do this remote and it's 

               still be a worthwhile job.  It's something that I 

               have personal pride in wanting to get better at, 

               and I feel like I'm steadily getting better.  

               There's something to be said of being out in the 

               field independently and trying to figure it out on 

               your own with no guidance, right?  So --

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  -- for 

               me, it's a puzzle.  Now, it remains to be seen.  

               I'm the type of person that tries to reassess my 

               goals every six months.  So I'm never going to say 

               never, right?  

                                MR. DAY:  That makes sense.  
                                                         24



               Because I do think what's cool is what you're 

               doing.  Maybe if they had a toilet underneath, you 

               know, the desk, maybe that would work for me.  But, 

               you know, right now I'm going to be remote, but I'm 

               enjoying it.  I'm enjoying and, you know, I think 

               I've said this since I've met you and we've been 

               talking for three or four months, I've always said 

               I've enjoyed it, right?  I haven't -- there hasn't 

               been one time where I'm like, "Oh, I don't enjoy 

               it."

                                MR. DAY:  Definitely.  I think 

               you've told me that sometimes they kind of come out 

               of left field with criticisms, but I think I told 

               you something like "Sometimes they criticize just 

               to keep you guessing about how valuable you really 

               are."  And that's kind of like -- that's kind of 

               the shady side of it, where it's like you can make 

               money and you can do, you know, really well.  And 

               you can find something that fits your lifestyle, 

               but at the same time, they're always, you know, 

               they're interested in trying to get people to work 

               for less.  So it's kind of that balancing act of --

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Right.  

               See --  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  
                                                         25



                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  -- I 

               don't know what the stats are, but I would imagine 

               that they're -- and you've had it chronicled on 

               your website, the shortages of just court reporting 

               in the industry of it not being exposed.  And 

               that's one of the -- I think the things that we're 

               united of starting this podcast to just raise 

               awareness that it's a very fulfilling, you know, 

               occupation if you decide to do it.  

                                But I would imagine that the 

               amount of lawyers versus the amount of people that 

               are court reporters is -- there's such a huge 

               disparity on top of judges on top of anybody that's 

               a court officer.  I think that, you know, it's one 

               of those things where like, kind of like a referee, 

               right?  Like, nobody really wants the referee.  So 

               there's kind of like a balance where it says like, 

               there's a shortage, and they still try to treat you 

               as if it's prestigious, but it can't be prestigious 

               and there's a shortage at the same time.  That's 

               where I find solace in knowing that, you know, 

               regardless of what I do, I'm going to be 

               professional.  I'm going to do the best I can no 

               matter what.  But at the end of the day, I just 

               know the court industry as a whole still needs us 
                                                         26



               more than they need -- than we need them.  You know 

               what I'm saying?  So that I don't feel necessarily 

               scared of in terms of like them keeping me on my 

               toes, right?  

                                So what I did want to ask you too 

               though is just the genesis of Stenonymous.com?  How 

               you came to that conclusion, because there must 

               have been something that guided you to say, "You 

               know what, I'm going to make a whole website, I'm 

               going to make a whole -- I want to raise awareness 

               in this specific niche."  It's, you know, it's -- I 

               just find it interesting that you got to that level 

               and it's matured over the years where there's a lot 

               of people that are watching it, and, you know, they 

               really want to get inside your brain.  How did you 

               start it and how did it develop over time?  

                                MR. DAY:  So I started just from 

               remembering all the difficult times that I had.  

               And kind of like you're saying, I had to learn it 

               on the job.  What does this mean?  What am I 

               supposed to do when XYZ happens?  You know, I can't 

               think of an exact example at the moment, but it's 

               kind of like you're saying, it comes at you fast 

               and you kind of learn as you go with minimal 

               feedback.  And basically, I started by typing out 
                                                         27



               all the things that I had had difficulty with, and 

               all the things that young court reporters were 

               coming on our message boards and asking questions, 

               and asking the same questions again and again and 

               again year after year after year.  And so, I 

               started to build popularity that way.  

                                And at some point, I started to 

               also document current events, things going on in 

               our field, things our associations were doing.  

               Trying to get people to be more involved in the 

               professional community so that we, you know, we 

               can't be taken advantage of the way I felt I was 

               taken advantage of as a young reporter because 

               basically I've done out the math and I think I was 

               making about 40 percent less than I could have.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Mm-hmm 

               (affirmative).  

                                MR. DAY:  So I started to document 

               these current events, and I started to realize 

               that, "Oh, these numbers don't really add up.  Like 

               the Bureau of Labor Statistics says we have 

               whatever it is, 21,000 court reporters, and the 

               speech to Text Institute says, we should have 

               23,000, and the National Court Reporters 

               Association says we have 27,000.  
                                                         28



                                And it's like, the more you looked 

               into it, the more it didn't make sense.  And so I 

               started to publish about that, and people were 

               interested because it totally went against the 

               grain.  It went against the professional 

               community's paradigm of just kind of like, "Oh, 

               let's just practice and do our best and be 

               professionals."  And it's like, no, guys, like, 

               there's a little bit of Tom Foolery going on here, 

               basically.  And it excites people.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  So going 

               into that, after you decided to make, you know, how 

               did you come up with the name, and then, I guess 

               just talking about the first couple of months of 

               just trying to get content.  And also, you know, 

               starting to finally be open because I'm sure that 

               people have approached you to just try to get more 

               of a digital presence outside of just the written 

               form.

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  More so 

               video and podcasts.  What made you start to just 

               think about giving this a chance?  

                                MR. DAY:  The blogging?  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Well, 
                                                         29



               just more so -- yeah.  Like the development of the 

               blog and then also just your -- now, at this point 

               in time in 2024, your willingness now to just have 

               other multimedia forms of disseminating the 

               information.  

                                MR. DAY:  Well, so I guess I'll 

               start with how I named it, and how I named it is 

               actually pretty funny.  I was walking to the movie 

               theater with a friend of mine and I said, "Yeah, I 

               really want to start writing and start documenting 

               all these things that we have had problems with 

               when we were younger, and all these things that 

               people come onto our message boards and ask about.  

               I want to make something and I want to make 

               something interesting.  And I want it to be like a 

               real presence."  

                                And at the time that Hacker Group, 

               Anonymous, or -- yeah, I think it was Anonymous.  

               They were, you know, in the news and they were real 

               popular.  He's like, "Why don't you call it 

               Stenonymous?"  And I'm like, "Oh." I went with it.  

               I ran with it.  And so after that, I just, like I 

               said, I wrote out things that I had trouble with.  

                                One of my first articles was, Get 

               a Real Job.  And Get a Real Job was actually all 
                                                         30



               the jobs you could get in New York City as a 

               stenographer.  And at the time it was workers 

               compensation, and grand jury, and the courts, and 

               something we call CART, which is basically 

               captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing.  I'm 

               trying to think.  I also mentioned teaching, and I 

               gave links to all the places that you would get 

               these applications and find information about this 

               stuff.  And because that was something that I had 

               an issue with.  

                                So anyway, as time went on, like I 

               said, I started to expand a little bit, I started 

               to do a little advertising, and all that kind of 

               stuff.  And what you realize pretty quickly is that 

               images and videos and this kind of multimedia 

               approach, it gets a lot more attention than just 

               writing.  

                                And so, for example, if I run an 

               advertisement on an article, maybe I'll get, you 

               know, let's say I'll get a thousand views on a 

               written article.  If I run an advertisement with a 

               picture, I'll get like 10,000, 20,000 views.  So 

               you start to see that people don't all respond to 

               sitting there reading a blog.  Some people respond 

               to hearing someone's voice, being able to 
                                                         31



               understand, oh, this is someone I can trust rather 

               than just this name on a screen, you know, this 

               faceless guy or this voiceless guy.

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  

               Interesting, interesting.  So how are you enjoying 

               your first podcast experience?  

                                MR. DAY:  Oh, I'm loving it.  

               There's totally better than you.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Well, 

               I've done this so many times, so I'm happy that you 

               are united in this front.  Because, you know, this 

               is something that I've grown in the past six months 

               that I've been doing.  It's very passionate about.  

               I truly enjoy it.  It's something that I wake up 

               and I -- it's like part of my day.  Something -- 

               like I said that I want to do well in.  And, you 

               know, I just think the things that I am involved 

               in, it's such a niche.  And I feel like if we could 

               expose other people to something that can be just a 

               viable solution to what they could be doing as an 

               occupation, I think we will make the court industry 

               a better place.  Especially with somebody -- you 

               under the helm given that information.  But --

                                MR. DAY:  I tell everybody, this 

               could be your dream job, you know, give it a shot, 
                                                         32



               you know?  And for me, I'm always pushing the 

               stenography.  So I tell them, go to National Court 

               reporters A to Z, go to Project Steno, go to Open 

               Steno, you know, Open Steno.org.  There's so many 

               different ways to start learning about it and start 

               getting into it, that I always found it a shame 

               that people have a hard time finding that 

               information.  I actually had a question for you, if 

               that's okay?  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Sure.  

                                MR. DAY:  I know for me there's 

               certain things I think about with this question, 

               but for you, is there anything you think, "Wow, I 

               wish I really knew this before I went in?"

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  What I 

               wish that I knew?  I wish that I knew -- well see, 

               the thing is that -- so I do another thing that's 

               very independent contract oriented, and you realize 

               it's kind of the same situation where a lot of the 

               information in the beginning is suppressed because 

               you don't know anything, right?  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  And the 

               more -- and it's not like you dig in the beginning, 

               it's more like you kind of discover things and you 
                                                         33



               go, "Wait a minute, if this deposition was $800, 

               why am I only getting 75?  Where's that other 700 

               going?"  So I'm not going to say that I didn't know 

               about that because it's the same thing in my other 

               line of work where it's like the people that run 

               things are the ones that set the price, and 

               sometimes the middleman gets a cut, this person 

               gets this cut, this person gets this cut.  It's 

               just that now I've grown, and I'm certain that we 

               will talk about what that is at some point.  

                                But, you know, as you get better 

               at the line of work that you're in, you start 

               knowing more, you start wanting more.  You start 

               realizing that you should have equal representation 

               at the table.  Somewhat so where you want to just 

               kind of like be independent, and you want to start 

               your own thing.  

                                So the thing is for me, I've 

               always thought that any court reporting agency that 

               I'm in as an independent contract has always been a 

               learning situation, where I think that I'm the 

               talent, I know that one day this is still working 

               towards me learning something in the future.  So, I 

               don't know.  Maybe I've always thought of it as a 

               means to an end of just being an expert at this 
                                                         34



               whole thing in its totality, right?  And I think 

               Stenonymous.com has given me, also colored me with 

               a lot of information.  

                                Maybe I wish I read your website 

               before I hopped onto a court reporting agency.  So 

               I think if I had to answer the question, I wish I 

               knew about your website, because maybe I would 

               revisit some options that I could have had as 

               opposed to just, you know, signing up because I 

               didn't know anything.  But at the same time, I am 

               happy where I'm at.  I'm, I want to say I'm content 

               with what I'm doing because I'm still in learning 

               mode.  The moment that I start feeling that I'm 

               plateauing and I'm not learning and it's not 

               working for me, I'll start thinking about different 

               situation.  And I know in the background, we are 

               working on some different things.  So I'm excited 

               for that.  

                                But I know for me, I'm just like 

               somebody that's really independent.  I like 

               standing on my own two feet.  I like figuring it 

               out on my own.  And if that means trying to figure 

               out another situation where I'm being able to 

               control that, I feel like I'm going to shine much 

               better in doing so in that regard.  Does that 
                                                         35



               answer your question?  

                                MR DAY:  Yeah, I think so.  I 

               think that the entrepreneurial mindset is something 

               that you really -- you can't recreate it, you know 

               what I'm saying?  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Right.  

                                MR. DAY:  Like, you can't really 

               teach it.  It just kind of has to come to each 

               person in their own time.  And it sounds like 

               coming into it, that's what you've got.  So you 

               have that ability.  And I would say most people, 

               you know, many people who come into this, and 

               probably most people have that ability, but not 

               everybody goes in that direction.  Not everybody 

               wants to get that kind of mastery.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Right.  

               Well, the only thing that I'll say in terms of the 

               mindset that you need to have, whether it be a 

               stenographer, you know, somebody that's voice 

               writing, or digital, I think one thing definitely 

               is always going to ring true, you have to be open 

               to learning in public, right?  

                                So I know that there's the 

               apprentice level in the background where you're 

               learning and you're trying to get to a threshold of 
                                                         36



               minute -- words per minute of you trying to type.  

               But, you know, when it's being recorded at this 

               moment in time, it's really hard in the beginning 

               to be perfect, right?  And still, you and I are 

               still not perfect when we're doing it, but we try 

               -- we strive to have that accuracy.  But it's 

               really hard, especially when you're learning, to be 

               at there, right?  So you're at 70 percent, and 

               you're striving to be a hundred percent.  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  But how 

               could I be a hundred percent if I've never done 

               this before?  Of course, I'm going to -- so at the 

               very least, if you have the growth mindset of 

               saying like there's more room for improvement and 

               eventually, you'll get there, and not being so hard 

               on yourself and trying to be perfect the first 

               time, I think you'll be very successful in this 

               type of line of work.  Even with the podcasting, 

               this is your first time.  I'm not going to hold you 

               to a standard that you're going to be nominated for 

               a podcast award when you --

                                MR. DAY:  Thank goodness.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  -- you're 

               starting out.  But at the very least you know like, 
                                                         37



               okay, you like it.  You feel comfortable in doing 

               it.  You feel okay with your voice.  You know what 

               your voice sounds like.  You've also been on other 

               multimedia platforms.  So at the very least, it 

               makes you want to improve.  It makes you want to do 

               it again, and that's all I can ask for.  Now, if 

               we're on our hundred episode I would hope that at 

               some point you're going to be like, "You know what, 

               I'm trying to get good at this."  So I hope that 

               answers the question.  

                                MR. DAY:  I think so.  I think so.  

               And actually, I'm not sure what it was, but I was 

               thinking while you were speaking, I actually made 

               this court reporter rates discussion group on 

               Facebook.  And that was -- that's kind of like when 

               you take that entrepreneurial mindset and you start 

               to apply it to things that aren't necessarily money 

               making, but more ethical based.  Because there's a 

               multi-pronged strategy to having created that 

               group.  First off, it's the consumers.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Right.  

                                MR. DAY:  Through my website and 

               my writing and my documentation, all that great 

               stuff, I realized that there was kind of a game 

               being played on consumers, where the companies are 
                                                         38



               bringing down the page rates, bringing down the 

               page rates, but then they're nailing them with all 

               these other little charges.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Right.  

                                MR. DAY:  And so now all that 

               stuff is out in the public, so consumers can just 

               go, oh, I could get this, you know, cheaper from, 

               you know, whoever, let's say me, or let's say you, 

               or whoever it is.  And then that person can make 

               more, and this agency, you know, doesn't need to be 

               taking all my money for -- doing me the honor of 

               printing basically.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah.  

               Listen, I think competition is always healthy, 

               competition always breeds creativity in terms of, 

               you know, the things that -- the way I think of 

               things.  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  But, you 

               know --

                                MR.  DAY:  And that --  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  You know, 

               I don't want to make this podcast too long.  The 

               only final question I want to ask for you after 

               doing this, I hope you had fun, but what are you 
                                                         39



               looking forward to of this, you know, eventually 

               evolving?  You want to get some guests in the court 

               reporting industry, do you want to get some 

               lawyers, like, what are you looking forward to and 

               what's your goal for this podcast to grow?  

                                MR. DAY:  All the above.  I mean, 

               I know -- I already know pretty much all the heavy 

               hitting stenographers in the field, and I'm pretty 

               sure that most of them will take the time to tell 

               their story.  But I would really love to get some 

               lawyers on the thing, and, you know, get their true 

               feelings.  And I imagine that it's going to be -- 

               again, you're going to find people all across the 

               spectrum.  There's going to be lawyers who are all 

               about hiring stenographers, there's going to be 

               people who don't, you know, they don't really care, 

               they don't mind if a digital's at the deposition.  

               There's going to be some that they don't even think 

               about the transcript because it doesn't matter to 

               them unless the thing is going to trial.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Right.  

                                MR. DAY:  And so, I really want to 

               start bringing together all those voices.  And in 

               fact, it's been the front page of my website for 

               the longest time, is Words and Voices.  And that 
                                                         40



               phrase is basically because we want people's 

               opinions.  We want people's ideas.  We want to have 

               a more full understanding of the range of how 

               people, you know, interact with our services and, 

               you know, our field.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah.  I 

               think that's important.  I also think sometimes 

               when I'm talking to a lawyer, they just -- I feel 

               like -- I don't know, I feel like I'm like the last 

               person on the bench.  And they're just like, "Yeah, 

               I'm not really going to respect you."  It's only 

               because when my personality comes out, they're 

               like, oh, I kind of like this guy, all right.  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  And then 

               they start treating me like a person.  But I have 

               to like infuse me in order for that to at least -- 

               at the very least have that conversation.  Normally 

               I'm just like an afterthought.  And that's probably 

               how you feel within, you know, the -- when you're 

               in the role.  But, you know, I'm looking to change 

               that.  I think that there should be representation.  

               I mean, we are there, right?  

                                MR. DAY:  Yeah.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  So why 
                                                         41



               shouldn't we have a voice?  I feel like that, you 

               know, obviously when you're doing the job, I think 

               you should be as professional as possible and then 

               -- and be accurate.  But you can still be you, 

               right?  I think there's nothing wrong with being 

               who you are at all times.  So that's my --

                                MR. DAY:  No, I --

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  -- that's 

               my final saying for today.  What were you going to 

               say?  

                                MR. DAY:  I was just going to say 

               I agree with you totally.  Never give up your 

               personality for any job, and that's for everybody 

               listening.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Yeah, 

               man.  I'm looking forward to this journey.  

               Figuring out what the next episodes are.  But I 

               hope you enjoyed your experience on your first 

               podcast.  

                                MR. DAY:  Absolutely.  Like I 

               said, I got one of the best.  

                                DIGITAL COURT REPORTER:  Okay.  We 

               are now off the record at 12:14 p.m.

The “Chaotic Good” of Court Reporting

I’m suspending most internet ops broadcasting the court reporter shortage fraud. It was a good year. My publications reached tens of thousands. Yet I can’t help but feel my energy is better spent elsewhere. I’m hopeful that, in time, the community comes to understand why I chose this method of telling the story and this iteration of the Stenonymous character. But I have to face certain realities. We’re in a period in history where companies can call fraud free speech and claim that the government should be barred from pursuing lies that have gone on for a long time. There are probably millions of scandals like ours or worse than ours, and not enough journalists in this country to cover even a healthy fraction of them.

As the multimillion dollar corporations let the one-year statute of limitations on defamation pass, I hope people start to question a bit. I was willing to put in print allegations of consumer fraud & name names in my own name without the privilege of anonymity. I retract nothing. This stuff will be searchable online pretty much forever. There’s certainly a cost to me. But what are consumers to think about a firm that can’t even do the bare minimum brand defense of dropping a comment to say “these allegations are false?”

I’ll still work on the community publicizing and publishing. I’ve got ideas. You’ve got ideas. Let’s put them in print!

First up, NYC “Freelancers,” if you’re interested in unionization, leave a contact email here. What I’ll do is I’ll collect these “pledges,” and at the point where we have a hundred or so we could pool money on real legal advice for implementing a deposition reporter union. My proposal would be to secure a contract that works out some kind of points system for refusing work and pay structure to stay by the page as we’ve always known it. Basic idea is that most of you wouldn’t be able to talk about this out of fear of blacklisting, so we use me as a go-between until the group is large enough to do what has to be done. Could take years, but let’s face it, I might be around another 30 years, so I’ve got time.

If you’re totally lost, let’s just say there are good arguments to be made that many of us meet the definition of common law employees, either commission-based or per diem. That means a whole heap of us are misclassified employees. That means that whatever you’re making now, there’s a good chance you could work out a better deal via collective bargaining. Similar to the concept of bulk buying power. Very pro-capitalism. All about charging what the market will bear. Bonus points if we get contractual provisions for the use of digital reporting, like a stenographer-to-digital ratio, which would guarantee, with the force of law behind it, that companies cannot just replace stenographers willy nilly.

And before somebody jumps in with “my skills earn me the top of the top, I don’t need no union, nope,” it’s cool, really. I get it. Some of you make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. I would think I’m a nut too. But then you meet reporters who are like “my agency doesn’t want to give me more than $3.25 in 2022 during a time of unprecedented shortage,” when everyone and their mom knows some reporters were getting $3.25 in 1990, and you start to realize that maybe something is not quite right here.

I was never quite able to verify the truth, but I was told by another reporter that one of the killers of the Federation of Shorthand was Diamond Reporting. “You don’t need a union, we’ll pay you your rates.” How poetic if that’s true. That was the company that said no copy sales for New York “freelancers” prior to the Veritext takeover. That was the company that was paying many of you $3.25, a 1990 rate, in 2010. So I sure don’t know if they helped kill the union, but I know for a fact that they capitalized big time on its death. Great anecdote for how companies will actively push for things that hurt your wallet. And something you should keep in mind the next time someone is insisting that you don’t need a union, often using their age and presumed “wiseness” to give weight to halfhearted reasons for why something that’s not really been tried won’t work. “Ah yes, here was a thing so ineffective that companies campaigned against it, sued it, and did everything in their power to bring it down.” In reality, the knowledge that we are underpaid came from historical documents left behind by that union. How twisted is that? It defends us even in death. Sounds like a fantasy novel.

Imagine holding in your hand a tool that, on average, raises your pay, and that you have evidence that it raised pay for people that came before you. You look at the tool, snarl up your face, and go “I don’t like this tool because I feel like the work I do with my bare hands is more fulfilling!” You throw away the tool. The people that would’ve had to pay you more cheer and tell you what a good, hard worker you are, and everyone is happy. Especially you, the hard worker. This is pretty much what I envision every time someone gives me an anti-union excuse, and I have heard pretty much all of them:

“The top reporters get the top pay and jobs!” Not true. There was a certain point in my career where I was the second-most qualified of about a half dozen friends and making the least money — and we’re talking up to 25% less. One agency wouldn’t work with me because I wasn’t in the field long enough at the time. But they worked with someone I knew who just so happened to have less time in the field than I did. I later went on to place 14th in the state’s court reporter civil service exam. Most of us want to believe in meritocracy. I saw for myself things are anything but.

“The harder you work, the more your reward.” Nope. I busted my ass as a 20-something running around New York City. Yeah, I work hard. Pretty much everybody in this city works hard. But you know what? I work a whole lot less hard and make a whole lot more money than I ever did. And I know for a fact there are people out there busting their ass harder than I ever will that make less money than I do. So hard work doesn’t have a damn thing to do with it either. I can self-justify and say my hard work then is what laid the foundation for my success now, but it’s just not true. I gained no professional advantage from being underpaid. Saying otherwise would be delusional self-aggrandizement. I reject telling 20-somethings that hard work is the deciding factor in success. It is one of many.

“Unions are corrupt.” Oh, conceded, some are. Bad leadership can make union membership unbearable. Unthinkable. But in the end you have to decide whether it is better to reform the institution that is supposed to be protecting you, and that you can sue if it fails in its duty of equal representation, or do away with it completely. Think about it this way. The threat is that eventually the person paying you will come swinging the (1d20) axe of “I just need to lower your pay or adversely affect your working conditions.” Could be any reason. Maybe they just want to move their cousin into your seat. Would you prefer no shield or a busted shield that you have some time to fix up and make work for you if that threat comes your way?

“Unions only protect bad employees!” Bad management protects bad employees. Unions typically set up a disciplinary procedure. Managers typically don’t want to follow that disciplinary procedure. The result is non-performers get to endlessly offload their responsibilities on performers while the union takes the blame for “protecting bad employees.” And at the end of the day, this is a great deal for management, because if you get frustrated and dissolve your union because it only protects bad employees, management now has no impediment to firing any of you for any reason whenever they want. Any of you ever had the work from your agency mysteriously dry up after you did something minor to displease them? We could make that never happen again.

“Unions are only for people that benefit from the lowest common denominator.” I’ve taken classes in and done a lot of reading on unionization. You don’t have to structure a union where everyone gets paid the same. You can create tiers, or points, or basically anything you can dream up, put into words, and get people to agree to. Funny that the people that think they’re so far above everyone else can’t imagine improving the models of the past.

“Unions don’t do anything!” Unions are a legal vehicle that, through legal and/or social pressure, encapsulate the terms and conditions of employment in a contract and defend the interests of its members. If there’s something more that you want it to do, you put it into words, you run it by union leadership, and if you don’t like the response you get from leadership, you band together with more union members to push the change or even vote union leadership out. Put it this way, if you do not care enough about your idea to do that stuff, can you really blame leadership for not doing it? It’s like when people get upset with me for not covering every topic. I’m one guy and the community won’t fund me enough to hire help. My effectiveness is limited by the support I get. So too are your union leaders. (Corporate leaders too, but money buys a lot of support, as it turns out.)

In a rare, perhaps unforgivable moment, I’m going to betray my union a bit and put in print that there’s a faction that has an issue it wants addressed. There’s been plenty of haranguing and handwringing over it, but there hasn’t been a single serious attempt by the faction to address the issue. I’ve had hours of my time wasted listening to people talk about an issue that they don’t care enough about to formally address in any substantial manner and gotten a front row seat to the “unions don’t do anything” people complaining about matters they’ll lift not a finger to solve. But, who knows, maybe one of them reads the blog and will ask me how I’d handle it if I wanted them to win. Point is that initiative drives outcomes. If you have no initiative, your outcome is decided by people that do.

Union dues are a drain on your wallet!” I guess? But it’s been shown that on average unionized workers make more than their non-union counterparts, even factoring in union dues. Specifically in our field, we can study non-union deposition reporters with unionized officials, and we can see that, even going 20 years without a substantial change, the page rates are still higher than private sector rates on average. Meanwhile attorneys say their bills have never been higher. Where is all that extra money going if not to you? The agencies. What do you think would’ve been more of a drain on your wallet, union dues, or literally and demonstrably all of the price increases from 1990 to now going directly to the corporate owner’s pocket? We have this funny habit of considering union dues “our money,” and price increases the “employer’s money,” but y’know, if your “employer” is raising prices and never giving you a raise, you’re effectively paying dues to your employer for the privilege of working for them. You just don’t get to see those dues come out of your paycheck, so it feels much better and you don’t have the urge to complain or do anything about it.

If it was possible someone would’ve done it already to collect all those union dues!” Someone I genuinely love — in fact, one of the people that saved my career — loves this line. And it cuts me deep every time because I’ll never really know if they’ve fooled themselves into accepting this fallacy as truth or if they know damn well it’s a fallacy and choose to publish anti-union rhetoric again and again anyway. I’m too chicken to ask and I don’t even know if the answer I’d get would be the truth. Sad day for me.

Why is it a fallacy? Union structures, in my lived experience, are less about expanding the power and profitability of the union and more about safeguarding and managing what they have already. It would genuinely surprise me if, at any point in the last 50 years, any of the New York City unions seriously considered a campaign to bring the deposition reporters into the fold. It would surprise me if they even conceived that such a thing might be possible. To make the connection or assertion you’d have to read the highlights of various labor laws and apply them to the way the job is done in modern times. And even then, you’ll probably still get a patchwork of realities where some people would qualify and some would not.

There’s also the potential political cost of current union members taking offense and deciding to vote out a leader that spends too much time on such a campaign, even if it would ultimately strengthen the union. Add the fact that you would likely have to modify union constitutions to support and allow it. So it’s not a matter of “if there was money in it, they would do it.” It’s a matter of looking at all the obstacles and saying “yeah, this isn’t my fight, and my union doesn’t pay me more money to fight it, so good luck with that.” But if it happened in reverse, where a large group of “freelancers” established a union, or deposition reporters unionized several agencies and then asked to be folded in under —- whoever, let’s say the legal support workers union — I think the results would be quite different. That’s just assuming they’d want the protection of a larger, more-established entity.

Skilled jobs don’t need a union.” The iron workers, carpenters, and all manner of construction people seem pretty skilled to me. And I just told you there’s a legal services staff association, LSSA 2320, and they represent paralegals, social workers, and others. ASSCR, Local 1070, and several CSEA branches represent court reporters. The whole skilled/unskilled thing feels like a rumor that got started to keep workers divided. And it works really well. We squabble with each other about why Joe burger flipper shouldn’t make $xx.xx per hour while the people paying us get away with murder against everyone right up to and including some of the most educated people out there.

All this is to say that the road ahead is difficult. But if we do not even try, then we’re just going to continue this game where the corporations reduce stenographer positions in favor of digital, get them to fight each other for the work, causing even more of a rates freeze (or effective drop). Then this’ll force more people out of the market, particularly the smart ones that don’t want to work for peanuts. And ultimately the pool of stenographers from which the courts recruit will fall to a place of no return, leaving the private sector to pick up the pieces via recording and transcribing. Game, set, match. That’s competition, baby, and it’s on a level that most of us in the “accuracy and ethics” crowd don’t think about. It’s time to flip the script and win the competition.

So let’s take a crack at it. Leave your contact info. Best case scenario, we do something historic and create a model that leaders in every state can follow, as well as upping your paycheck and giving you more worker rights than you currently enjoy. Worst case scenario, it doesn’t work out and everyone has a big laugh at my expense.

If you’re tired of being underpaid during a time of “unprecedented” shortage, it’s time to take a stand!

Addendum:

Even doctors are unionizing due to the corporate consolidation of America. I’m willing to put down at least $1,000 to help all of you with the legal fees.

There’s also the “unfortunate” truth that if we make an active effort to do this, agencies might raise rates just to avoid having to deal with a union for the rest of their existence.

1/11/24 update:

Court Reporters, the Department of Labor’s New Interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act Classification Clause Probably Means You’re An Employee.

Walden 2023 Parody Commentary *SPOILERS*

For this writing exercise, I wrote this while I was watching the movie with the intention of publishing it for you all as a sort of parody commentary. It’s going to make me very upset if this gets me more donations than my activism / citizen journalism stuff. Guess we’ll find out. For the record: I really liked it. I think Emile Hirsch gave it life and played his part really well. But the movie is also kind of all over the place and some viewers are going to find that jarring and “nope out.

Definitely try this writing exercise with your families with whatever movies you want. It was fun for us.

Just to make this incredibly clear, this is “no holds barred” spoilers. If you are the type of person that doesn’t want spoilers, STOP NOW.

NOTES MADE WHILE WATCHING:

The beginning was humorous. He comes off super socially awkward or nerdy, which I totally relate to.

Mark Kislingbury was mentioned. You could tell they did some research on our field.

They showed this school scene that was really good at explaining why we’re all insane.

Don’t object during closing, Lloyd, it’s rude.

The court scene in the beginning was super dramatic and over the top. Walden does this side eye thing that I’m pretty sure I do too.

Scene where he’s cleaning the steno machine. I let mine collect grime. I know I’m in the minority.

The religious scene was a little bit thought provoking and a fair representation of the thoughtfulness and kindheartedness of the religious among us.

When Walden tells the doctor “in laymen’s terms I’m a court reporter,” I exploded.

The pacing is a little choppy after that. Something about a birthday and someone snatched the boy.

(NOTE: Little did he know, he was missing a major plot point.)

When Walden faints and finds out he has a meningioma and he’s explaining why he knows the term, it’s classic us. Did they design this movie for us?

His desire to do the steno contest over attending to his brain tumor is a little on the nose mocking us. But I’ll accept it for a little steno media.

When he got in the elevator with the ex-New York City stenographer Francesca asked, “is he gonna get laid because he’s a stenographer?”

The whole thing about feeling the words and not just typing them is a made up thing. But his inability to understand she was flirting with him was great acting.

I have to say it’s taking a while to get to the point. Something about church. I don’t really get it. But next thing he’s at a bar. He doesn’t drink but then he orders a whiskey. Somebody lyin’.

Next thing we know Walden’s in a store that’s getting robbed and he bottles the dude.

The childhood scenes were pretty deep. Really draws you in and gives you a peek at why the character is the way he is. And I suspect there’s some real-life truth to the attachment some can have to the machine. I’ve heard directly from other reporters how trauma has impacted people’s view of steno. It’s interesting. I wish we could get some kind of case study going.

When they let the bad guy go free on “a technicality,” I got a laugh at how cliche it was.

This idea that a drunk stenographer can burn someone in an oven is an idea that was worth being on film.

At this point we are asking: What state is this? This accent is crazy, I can’t place it.

I love that the police are showing crime scene evidence to an off-duty stenographer. I’ve received crime scene photos by accident before, but only because my name was one letter off from the ADA.

We’re looking at each other like how small is this town? The entire cast is in this church right now.

Francesca guesses the plot of the movie at 39 minutes in: “He’s actually in a coma and none of this is real, or it’s a psychotic episode based on the brain tumor, or he’s dead.”

(NOTE: She did not, in fact, guess the plot of the movie at 39 minutes in.)

The church scene is really over the top.

Why is this small town courtroom so busy?

Francesca says it’s the creepy stenographer lady. Is she wearing shoulder pads?

It’s official, Walden is more oblivious to flirting than me, and I’m impaired in that regard thanks to genetics.

Is this movie supposed to take place in the 80s? Don’t think we’ve seen a cellphone.

Do fancy people talk this way? Don’t they keep the gossip behind people’s backs?

The guy sleeping on the chair in the red and orange seems out of place. Is this a date? We’re confused now. One’s in a Hawaiian shirt and the other is in a Tuxedo.

FRANCESCA: If Dexter was a stenographer, but only the last season of Dexter.

This lady’s not creepy. I’m retracting that on my Fiancée’s behalf.

The Men of Court Reporting really do got it like that.

I still don’t understand who the disabled guy is. Guess it’s good to have some media with that kind of a character? It’s an interesting choice. I like it.

We love how the people from church are in the courtroom.

Do we really need to give stenographers guns? Is that the image we want the public to see? I’m just kidding. The best was “who the fuck are you?” “The stenographer.” Hirsch does an amazing job of making Walden Dean this really funny brand of scary-weird. Maybe they read Stenonymous?

This whole relationship thing is weird.

Ah. They used the disabled guy as a prop in this really uncomfortable arrest scene. That’s a good descriptor for the movie. Uncomfortable, funny, scary, weird.

We finally saw a phone.

Another prayer scene with Walden Dean. His descent is crazy.

So much crime in this 30-person town where the stenographer is immediately informed of every single crime that happens. Walden Dean’s spy network is probably better than mine.

Disabled guy’s name is George.

Why is he drinking so much? This has got to be a dream sequence.

His girlfriend’s back. She probably has a name too. Did I miss it? Does he even know it? Francesca had to look it up on IMDB.

Bro she’s reading his trauma typing. This is heartbreaking. This whole bit about him being a ghost is interesting. I can’t really tell what this movie wants to be, but it’s definitely art.

The cop scene about not letting the sadness into the home is really good to see put into media. In my mind it relates to the vicarious trauma people in many jobs can experience.

(NOTE: Do not take that shit home with you. It is deleterious to your health. We are recognizing this more in the field every day.)

“EXCUSE ME. Did these women consent to this?” Absolutely perfect delivery.

Not sure how I feel about Walden gunning down those guys. They stab him so I guess it makes sense. But also there’s the imagery of a white government worker gunning down…yeah. Maybe this movie is a psyop to trigger the woke and get publicity? Kidding.

(NOTE: That would explain the decision to cast Hirsch.)

Them taking George to the bad man’s house and cuffing him to the door is kind of hilarious. The creepy vibe is really well done though.

Skeleton classroom scene gave me the creeps. Good execution.

That relationship he has with the judge is cool but it’s a little too intimate.

??? Why’s he pointing a gun at him? Is he the bad man? This totally eluded me. Wow. And the judge has some kind of mental abnormality for sure. The discomfort of this whole scene is pretty off the charts. Has anyone seen something like this?

And then the judge pulls the stenographer’s secret weakness, telling him he’s the best. Did he kill him? We don’t know.

…oh. He’s dead.

Do they all have assigned seats in church?

And then we’re going to end on a cliffhanger where Walden can apparently keep on killing after the detective figured out it was him. Maybe the whole thing is making fun of American justice and how small towns can just kind of disappear people.

…that was an experience.

W e l c o m e W-BG

t o

t h e TOT

e n d EPBD

o f -F

m y PHAOEU

b l o g PWHROG

p o s t POEFT

The Court Reporter Shortage is Half as Bad as the Speech-to-Text Institute Claimed It Would Be, Maybe Less

Saw the claim that there’s a nationwide deficit of 5,500 court reporters in the Brooklyn Eagle. As anybody that obsessively refreshes my website knows, we’ve seen this before. Past NCRA President Meadors stated earlier this year that that number was lifted from the Ducker Report in a different article. He also commented that the Ducker Report “has been pretty well debunked now.” I recall that NCRA Strong mentioned something about Ducker too.

The Speech-to-Text Institute made the claim that we’d have a shortage of 11,000 by now.

A Speech-to-Text Institute graphic that Stenonymous badly cropped and uses to explain that the court reporter shortage was artificially inflated by a consortium of businesses behind a sham nonprofit.

Oh, I’m sorry, 11,345. And yes, I see the 5,500 number in the 2018 slot. Raises questions. Are journalists ignoring the 11,345 number because they just don’t know about it, they know it’s inaccurate, or some other reason? And why does our shortage constantly make the news? And why is news about a shortage juicier than news about a corporate rigging of an entire market?

That aside, does anyone get why I called Speech-to-Text Institute, Veritext, and U.S. Legal Support fraudsters yet?

Most of the individual people in these organizations are just people doing their jobs or trying to make the most profit. That’s not a bad thing. But someone, somewhere along the way, decided it would be a good idea to lie about these numbers and fool students, jobseekers, consumers, workers, small business owners, associations, court administrators, and the general public. And certainly at this point these organizations have chosen to ignore my letters and activism despite a known propensity of the big boxes to harass court reporters for what they post on Facebook. I feel like, law in general, we look at people’s actions to tell us their intent. So even in some bizarro world where it wasn’t their intent to rig the market and jump their revenue like $500 million, it’s not like they stopped once they knew what they were doing.

When big men in this industry are threatened by powerful women, they start saying words like slander and defamation. When I do it? Carte blanche. Checkmate, sexists. I might have some partial face blindness going on, but I see you for the cowards you are. I’m on their side.

And, in a literary, figurative, nonviolent, and patriotic sense,

we’re coming for ya.

Bonus:

I knew there was a propaganda campaign before I knew there was a propaganda campaign.

Stenonymous Source: The Actual Per-Page Rate Comes To $9.44…

Stenonymous (anonymous) source provides redacted Imagine Reporting invoice.

Anonymous: “Imagine Reporting in San Diego was recently acquired by Lexitas – one of the latest monopolization/consolidation moves here in CA, hence the Dallas address on the invoice. The result? They bumped up the prices. The actual per page rate comes to $9.44/pp for this 143 page transcript, after factoring in all the add-ons. I wonder how much $/pp they paid the reporter…”

I have to point back to my research about tacit parallelism. Even where competitors are not actively colluding, they see that they can jack up the prices because everybody is jacking up the prices. I don’t believe that Lexitas or Imagine was a part of the Speech-to-Text Institute or the market manipulation there. But we’re seeing how the continued consolidation of the field is leading toward very high prices for attorneys. It seems page rates are being kept artificially low and some of these companies are relying on the add-ons and surcharges to make a buck. It’s pretty smart, since it can almost double revenue.

Just to drive this home — and I get it, I’m in a different state — reporters in New York City are 30 years behind inflation. If their rates had kept up with inflation, the rate would be around $6.00 per page. That’s on our automatic O+2s . Now, to put this into perspective, reporters aren’t generally making $6.00, and though I’m overjoyed when people come out of the woodwork to say they make more than that, I hate to tell you that you’re in the deep minority. When I came out of school I was offered $2.80 (2010). Many of my classmates were offered $3.25 and that was considered a good rate. Last year I had at least one person report that they were still being offered $3.25. Some say they’ve gotten $4.00. Some say they’ve gotten $4.50. Nowhere near $6.00.

And again, with all the add-ons, we’re looking at a charge of $9.44 or $9.46, so it’s basically taking what reporters should be paid, adding 60%, and sending out a bill. That’s in the context of a profession where previously there were 70-30 splits in favor of reporters. Then we look at what reporters are being paid, and just to be nice, we’ll take the $4.50. $9.46 – $4.50. $4.96. That $4.96 is 110% of the $4.50. And now just to complete the thought, $9.46 – $3.25. $6.21. 191% of the $3.25 attorneys might pay if we just cut out the middleman — or at least the middlemen charging high.

The skeptic says: So what? You’re New York. This is California — or Texas — or wherever. To that I say if there was a genuine shortage on the scale that it was advertised as being, agencies would simply be pulling New Yorkers to go certify, license, and work. And this can be mathematically shown. If the rate for New Yorkers should be close to 6 and is actually 4.50 (we’ll cut out the 3.25s and 2.80s and pretend everyone’s getting a decent O+2). 6 – 4.50 = $1.50. We’re talking about a 33% raise for some of the best-paid people and more than doubling the income of kids who get out of school and accept $2.80 a page because they just don’t know any better. And that $6.00 is still a heck of a lot lower than the $9.44. Even if we went back to the 70-30 splits with $6.00 to the reporter, it’d be around $8.58 a page. This also doesn’t account for places where the cost of living is lower than New York City, which would effectively be an even higher raise. Again, these business folks are all about numbers and money. If there was a monumental shortage rather than a desire to depress court reporter incomes, they’d be easily pulling people in with raises or a lower cost of living — unless everywhere in the whole entire country is as underpaid as New York City, which seems unlikely. They were paying us 25 cents on copies while Ohio was getting 2 bucks.

So thank you to my Stenonymous source. You not only helped me show my audience the heavy cost of court reporting add-ons potentially doubling attorney bills, but also help bring out the fact that the shortage that was advertised (70% of the field vanishing by about 2033) is not the shortage we got (coverage issues in the California courts that refused to use money earmarked for enticing court reporters),

The rest is up to the people that share this article and keep attorneys and court reporters informed.

Stenographer Shortage? Not On My Watch! Stenofluencer Ad Launches… Will You Stand With Us?

The Stenonymous ad campaign with Stenofluencer launched quietly last night. Thank you to everyone that took the time to like and share. See below for how you can help.

Stenonymous Ad Campaign with Stenofluencer

I believe this can be part of a larger series with help from readers like you. Any money sent to Stenonymous during the lifetime of this ad campaign (until September 11, 2023), will be designated toward developing and running more advertising to reduce the shortage. Stenonymous has put out tons of information with regard to advertising metrics and the fact that solvable localized shortages were painted as an unsolvable national problem. Up until now, a lot of my advertising was aimed at attorneys to educate them on the issues we’re facing in the field. But the objective of solving the localized shortages still remains. For an example of how this plays out in the real world, I know for a fact that right now the Bronx is hurting for court reporters more than any other borough in New York City. Meanwhile, at least one freelancer in the private sector reported they were told there were too many reporters and not enough work. So even in individual cities, we’re seeing uneven shortage impacts.

Please consider donating to Stenonymous today to end localized shortages. Based on this ad’s current stats, I expect it will cost $150 per 1,000 engagements, $30 per 1,000 impressions. With the help and support of people like you, I believe we can bring those numbers down to half of what they are today. To put these numbers into perspective, about $30,000 would get the ad in front of a million people, and about $150,000 would get a million people to like or share it if progress is linear. $30,000 is more or less the equivalent of every court reporter throwing down a dollar. We don’t need that kind of money to make an impact, but raising more money will make a bigger impact than the one I will make by myself. If you donate, please email in or comment below what geographical area(s) you feel need the most advertising, as it will help us improve audience targeting on future ads.

Stenonymous can be sent money through PayPal or Zelle (ChristopherDay227@gmail.com), Venmo @Stenonymous, the donation box at the front page of Stenonymous.com, or the special donation box I’m setting up below. Even if you cannot contribute any amount of money, please share this on social media so that it can get in front of the people that can.

Thank you for standing with us!

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Stenonymous.com One-Time Donation.

Stenonymous.com Monthly Donation

Stenonymous.com Yearly Donation

Choose an amount

$1.00
$10.00
$100.00
$5.00
$20.00
$30.00
$5.00
$60.00
$100.00

Or enter a custom amount

$

Thank you for your support!

Thank you for your support!

Thank you for your support!

Donate yearlyDonate yearlyDonate yearly

Addendum:

Due to an oversight on my end about how Facebook presents information, I mistakenly believed the Cost Per Mille was lower than it currently is. I will have more accurate data and an explanation by the end of the campaign. The overall principle still stands that community support will make or break this campaign.

Stenographer: The Shortage is Not What Was Forecasted.

Cassandra Caldarella reached out to me a while ago with some information about California. Given my relative lack of familiarity with California’s court reporting laws and statistics, the interaction was very welcome. I’ve said it many times, but I would be nowhere without information sent in by readers.

The first thing I was told was that in 2013 there were 7,100 active CSRs in California and that there are now 6,580 CSRs in 2023, a loss of 520, or about 8%. A loss of about 50 per year, or 0.7% of that 7,100 total. The Ducker Report told us something like 70% of reporters would be retiring between 2013 and 2023, so about 2.3% a year. 4.67% per year if you count from 2018, when the shortage was supposed to start getting bad. What does all this mean? The California shortage may be half as bad as it was forecasted to be.

An explanation of CSR license numbers from Cassandra Caldarella.

We can pull straight from Ducker to confirm something is off.

Ducker Report, Forecasted Supply for CA in 2018, 6,110.

There was a 6,110 supply of stenographers forecasted in 2018, and it was supposed to get worse and worse every year until 2018. If it is accurate that there are now 6,580, then we are doing much better than the forecast.

Cassandra went on to explain that these were not straight losses and that there were a lot of new CSRs coming in.

I was then given a yearly breakdown of out-of-state CA CSR licensees. The average before COVID was about 10 per year. 2020 to 2023, that jumps to about 16.

Out-of-state California CSR licenares per year according to Cassandra Caldarella.

I did go snooping for these numbers, because I don’t like to publish without some fact checking, and I did find at least one piece of information from SB662 that seems to contradict or call into question these numbers.

2022, 5,605 CSRs according to SB662 bill text. 4.,829 listed an address in California. 8,004 in 2000. 7,503 in 2010. 6,085 in 2020.

That’s a much more grim outlook. But perhaps it’s just market forces at work? Unless 30% of the workforce has been replaced by digital, it means that the demand for court reporters is simply lower than it once was or that there was not enough demand in the market for those 8,004 CSRs. A lot of people believe in the self-correction of markets. Why is our labor market any different? We could blame it on government regulation. Then again, we could also blame it on the larger corporations that stood by and did basically nothing for half a decade. If there was a retirement cliff, they sure weren’t worried about it, and I think that says a lot.

Let’s work with the most relevant numbers presented here. 7,503 in 2010. 1,418 drop from 2010 to 2020. A loss of about 19%, 1.7% a year. Still below the 2.3% to 4.7% it was supposed to be, but not quite as rosy as the 0.7% figure I was hoping for.

I’d really like to get the discussion going here. Are there more accurate direct sources I’ve missed? Has anybody run these numbers and come up with similar results? Have I gotten something completely wrong?

The comments are open.

Addendum:

Some edits were done to the images and text in this post after it went live. Subsequently, I was sent a spreadsheet that purports to show about 6,849 California CSRs active as of May 10, 2023. So, after seeing that, I think it’s reasonable to conclude that we are in much better shape than was forecasted.

NCRA Admits Court Reporter Shortage Less Severe Than Forecasted?

In a May 5, 2023 article by Tracey Read, issues with recording were addressed. Interestingly to me, there was a blurb in there about our shortage.

In a 2023 article, it is stated that according to NCRA there is -currently- a shortage of 5,500 court reporters.

You might look at that and say, “so what?”

Remember those Speech-to-Text Institute folks that I call frauds? Well, let’s just take a look at this screenshot from what I just linked.

In a projection released by the Speech-to-Text Institute years before 2023, it was stated that there would be a
gap (shortage) of 11,345 court reporters in 2023. A number that is potentially double the actual shortage.

On May 6, 2023, I reached out to NCRA to find out if this article was accurate, and I will publish the response, if any, in an addendum at the bottom of this post. If there’s no addendum, assume no response yet. I’d say check back in a week. As of now, all I’ve been told is “let us check and see where this might have come from, if anywhere, Christopher. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.”

Hopefully this makes it pretty clear why I’ve been so stuck on this issue. A shortage of 11,345 is a lot different than a shortage of 5,500, and now we have in print two very different numbers for 2023.

It seems pretty clear to me that our shortage is less severe than was forecasted, which means that it is more manageable than we have been told for about 5 years, which means that the big boxes in the Speech-to-Text Institute Bloc, having as much market share and working with as many reporters as they do, knew for a fact that the shortage was not as bad as forecasted, and perpetuated the lie anyway.

It’s bittersweet for me. I have been writing about the possibility of false claims being used to demoralize stenographers for almost half a decade, maybe longer. Many who have examined my writing and documentation over the years agree that there is something suspicious going on in stenography land. But many don’t have the time to investigate years worth of chronological discoveries and analyses. And quite frankly, after my medical issues in late 2021, it was easier for some to dismiss me entirely than to believe that such misconduct was occurring in our field.

But this should give stenographers a lot of hope. The shortage is less severe than forecasted. The NCRA is indisputably the strongest court reporting association and in the best position to address the court reporter shortage to the extent that it does exist. And as word spreads that the situation is not hopeless, as so many shills would have had my colleagues believe, we have a chance at drawing in investors to create new and better schools, and expand and improve existing programs in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.

Should it turn out that this is not NCRA’s position, my past analyses about the shortage being less severe than forecasted stand. But then this shifts to a really good point: News media can make game-changing statements and be completely wrong. If we’re not funding our own media arm, we may very well be drowned by lies and incompetence. That’s the state of modern journalism. As industries grow bigger, more complex, and require more coverage, journalism is seeing an economic contraction and nearly a 10% reduction in jobs between now and 2031. Fewer journalists covering more news means we’d better start hiring some journalists if we want a fair shake. Oh, and the other side has probably been doing that for years, let’s not forget that part.

I leave my core audience with a poem.

AUFT AEFD SAEUD WHA T- SAEUD FPLT

EU SEUPL PHREU SHAEURD T- W- -T WORLD FPLT

EU TPHAOU TPHOT W-R T- HRED RBGS

OEPBL THAT WHAOEUT TPHRAG SHUD TPHOT -B UPB TPURLD FPLT

SKP SHUD KWES A RAOEUZ RBGS

AZ THE OFPB TKO RBGS

HRAOBG TPOR TRAO*UT SKPUL TPAOEUPBD TK-RB

TAES HRAOBG -G TPOR U TAO FPLT

Addendum:

NCRA President Jason Meadors responded to my initial May 6 inquiry on May 12, 2023.

“Chris, mystery solved. That was lifted from the Ducker Report, which was before my time and has been pretty well debunked now.”

A big thanks to NCRA for the transparency and honesty.