File this one under “careful what you write online.”
As posted by a Stenonymous Source:
This is one of the reasons I am so hell bent on putting companies in their place over the fraud stuff and why I encourage people to send me things and anonymously “speak through the blog.” I acknowledge that these folks have a great deal of power over us. I use my position as someone not dependent on them to reveal the dirty things they do to reporters, even during this time of alleged shortage.
This story is not unique. I have been a part of our social media communities for many, many years, and I have seen firsthand the horror stories of people denied work because another reporter took it upon themselves to make trouble for them. It’s not right, but it’s a reality we must face head on.
I still find it hilarious that these companies, when faced with someone that they cannot retaliate against, don’t dare speak a word. The entire world can Google Veritext fraud, for example, and the company has not acknowledged such for almost three years. Meanwhile, I’ve formerly published that the company went after somebody for what they put on Facebook. No spies send my posts to them? What a shame.
How interesting that the habitual bullying of women is acceptable and normalized, but when a man steps up and calls them out, they shudder at the thought of responding. I guess we know why Veritext has a B IDR. Leaders so spineless would run a company straight into the ground and the lenders know it.
Support Stenonymous publishing with a donation today! It will help me pay for a recently contracted writer and get more of our stories out there.
If you’re interested in being featured, feel free to reach out. Chris@Stenonymous.com with your pitch. You can also write Chris@Veritext.org or Chris@ChristopherMichaelDay.com, at least until 2025.
Enjoy your weekend!
Note: I have no information that Veritext was the company that retaliated in this specific case, but they’ve almost certainly done it before, and I was told they’ve done it before.