I’ve already commented, in my own way, that things don’t seem right in California. Here, PYRP makes the astute point that the big box companies likely would’ve opposed the bill if it was not in their best interest, among many other great points.
I’ve called what’s being done to consumers fraud for many reasons, and that’s a word that pops up in this statement too. Ultimately, it’s that kind of bravery and boldness that will seize the day, and is a departure from the positive toxicity that permeates stereotypical corporate cultures, including our own.
All I can really say is that association board members should heed these words and realize that the more advocacy that is shouldered by nonprofits like PYRP or for-profit enterprises like Stenonymous, the more advocacy dollars will flow away from traditional associations. The success or failure of our institutions rides on the motivations and feelings of working reporters. If people feel that associations are not doing enough, or that associations are working against their interest, then wallets will, perhaps rightfully, close, in some cases permanently.
See the full text of PYRP’s statement below.
SB 241, linked text.
Protect Your Record Project maintains a contact form here.
One thought on “Protect Your Record Project issues Statement on SB 241”
Congratulations CA! You succeeded in having the CRB publish a list of NON-CSR-owned agencies. Way to go! So the out-of-state agencies and big boxes get to be promoted and marketed on the CRB website, and the wholly owned agencies don’t get to be on that list? There’s no separate list of VIP agencies who are following the CA laws? Not a surprise that the BB’s all supported SB 241. Yes, it was beneficial for them. They pulled one over on the 7,000 certified shorthand reporters and agencies in CA. Anyone who was AT that table ought to be ashamed of themselves!