Jon Stewart on AI: They’re Already Having an Arms Race to See Who Will Be the Monopoly.

More Perfect Union posted a clip of Jon Stewart talking to Federal Trade Commission Chairperson Lina Khan.

This was so incredibly moving to me that I had to transcribe it. Lina Khan masterfully puts into words what I’ve been trying to communicate for a long time. Government is just one area where we must worry about the concentration of power and the looming threat of autocracy or autocrat-like power. The knowledge that we need to guard against the rise of “economic autocrats” has existed in this country for over 100 years. I feel there are parallels to our field. We are merely on a lower level in terms of the money at stake.

It still pains me to believe our issues are too small for the FTC to care about and too big for the state agencies to want to look at. But I acknowledge the good work it’s trying to do after decades of minimal antitrust enforcement.

I provide a plain text version below and then a download of the PDF:

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑

Partial transcript of Jon Stewart speaking to Lina Khan, Chairperson of the Federal Trade Commission.

Transcribed by Christopher Day, Stenonymous.com.

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑

MR. STEWART:  It’s already being consolidated.  Apple has bought 30 AI models.  Microsoft has probably bought ‑‑ Google has bought ‑‑ they all buy AI startups and put them behind their paywall.  And they’re already having an arms race to see who will be either the monopoly or this will be oligopoly. 

I’ve got to tell you, I wanted to have you on a podcast, and Apple asked us not to do it, to have you.  They literally said, “please, don’t talk to her.”  Having nothing to do with what you do for a living.  I think they just ‑‑ I didn’t think they cared for you, is what happened.  They ‑‑ they wouldn’t ‑‑ they didn’t ‑‑ they wouldn’t let us do even that dumb thing we just did in the first act, on AI. 

Like, what is that sensitivity?  Why are they so afraid to even have these conversations out in the public sphere? 

MS. KHAN: I think it just shows one of the dangers of what happens when you concentrate so much power and so much decision making in a small number of companies. 

I mean, going back all the way to the founding, there was a recognition that in the same way you need the Constitution to create checks and balances in our political sphere ‑‑

MR. STEWART: Right.

MS. KHAN: ‑‑ you also needed the antitrust and antimonopoly laws to safeguard against concentration of economic power, because you don’t want an autocrat of trade in the same way that you don’t want a monarch. 

MR. STEWART: But then it took them ‑‑ I mean, it wasn’t until the Sherman Act in, what, 1890 something…

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑

End of clip shared on X, formerly known as Twitter, by More Perfect Union on April 2, 2024.

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑

DOWNLOAD:

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑

Now for some creative musing:

Educated by my country,

I could only watch in horror as

the knowledge of the past was swept aside.

They called us the most educated generation.

Then did not heed our words.

Our keepers said we could be anything.

Then voted for those that would leave us nothing.

The generations before us? Conditioned.

Conditioned to believe hard work is virtuous.

From a time when you could trust the television.

From a time when you had the television.

A time when hard work was rewarded better.

Loyalty ran both ways.

Was that a lie too?

Hard work is the only thing I’ve ever known.

Indeed, every person should know what it is to reach down deep and try hard.

Because otherwise the heart does not beat.

Because before I did, but after my birth, I was not alive.

But letting others harm your children is wrong.

The television did not tell or envision the real dangers.

Allowing predators to prey upon our American Dream.

And I understand. The world is different from when you walked it.

And I will miss you.

Those children you fought for?

I will fight for them in a way society never let you.

Because one day I may have my own.

They will have to learn to live and love alongside the other children.

They will have to play and grow in the world that we design.

Design by our action.

Design by our inaction.

Design by our empathy.

Design by our psychopathy.

They will know their father tried to change the country that would educate them.

For the better.

They will know their mother wanted their American Dream to be lucid.

So that they could be anything.

To those that would deride those like us:

“Though our songs may never be sung,

our stories will echo into eternity.”

Shameless plug for Patriots Against Corporatism, a concept that would unite left-leaning and right-leaning folks into a movement that defends our freedom against “autocrats of trade.”

Addendum:

I was later sent this TikTok with more from Jon Stewart on AI.

Meta Claims Federal Trade Commission Structure is Unconstitutional

Meta respectfully requests that this Court declare that certain fundamental aspects of the Commission’s structure violate the U.S. Constitution, and that these violations render unlawful the FTC Proceeding against Meta.” Reported by AP.

U.S. Senator Edward Markey (D) reportedly stated “In the face of a potentially massive fine, Meta’s adoption of extreme, right-wing legal theories to challenge our country’s premier consumer protection agency reeks of desperation.”

The political bullshit aside, this is a serious problem. We now have mega corporations openly attacking the legitimacy of the agencies meant to regulate them. What fucking nerve. Corporations are people? When was the last time you saw a regular person have the balls to argue in court, through a LAWYER, that an executive agency created 109 years ago is unconstitutional? Who does that? Usually the sovereign citizens. The free men of the land. The people that have no respect for the law, society, or the various mechanisms available to effect change under the current system.

The scary thing is this could fly. Legitimization and power is a tricky thing in human social dynamics. It doesn’t matter if you’re the strongest, the smartest, the bravest, or anything else. All that matters is people’s perception of you. For example, with my wild-man publishing strategy, I made it possible to get all this information out into the public in such a way that it silenced the other side’s lies. After the incident in 2021, I decided to incorporate what had happened to me into the strategy, and decided we could “coin flip” it, and if people accepted what I was writing and pumped me up with support to go fight the fight we really need to fight in our field, I could make real ground very rapidly (math omitted). The alternative was things could go very, very badly and everybody could laugh off the mentally ill man making the “ridiculous,” albeit true, claims. So I set the stage such that if things go well, yay for stenographers and small businesses. If things go poorly, you can all just outcast me so it doesn’t stain you 🤷🏻‍♂️. My strongest supporters, consciously or subconsciously, realized this is the case and threw in money and time to help — still do to this day. But there is a percentage of people who mock and deride me, mostly quietly away from my ears, but sometimes within earshot of my 1,000-person network. I’ve given up on the spitballers. They are too stupid to identify the coin flip or understand how it benefits them. There’s still a pretty huge middle ground that hasn’t heard of me or doesn’t care right now, so who really knows what the future holds?

But the point on legitimacy: Anything could’ve happened. Anything can still happen. And it stops people from opposing me publicly because in the end they’re not sure which way the coin will land. This is a microcosm of our larger political situation in the United States and this Meta situation. It’s a coin flip. If enough people, or the “correct” people (judges), accept Meta’s arguments, we may very well see a crushing blow to the FTC in our lifetime. Alternatively, people could freak on Meta for attacking their country’s legitimacy and Meta would be forced to backpedal to keep its legitimacy, if it even could. Of course, the truth is that a lot of people haven’t heard of this Meta situation or don’t care right now, so who really knows what the future holds?

This is all further complicated by the fact that humans are not persuaded by facts, they are persuaded by propaganda. Something that Martin Luther King, Jr. likely understood. Something that science is beginning to understand. This is just how our brains work. Even mine. You can build truth seeking into your worldview to help diminish susceptibility to propaganda, but in the modern world we’re bombarded with information all day, every day, so if even just 1% of that tricks you because you are very smart, you get tricked at least 3 times a year, and most of us don’t think about it.

I’ve thought a lot about power dynamics over the last few days. Our community’s very own James McAllister, someone that has worked tirelessly to bring steno into more languages and recruit more stenographers, an amazing man, wrote me something last night I’d like to close on and share with all of you, because I believe that all of you should see it:

“We Are Power!

(Inclusive of everyone reading.)

More Graphics for the Stenographic Legion

As I went into in another post, pictures get several times more engagement than text pieces. But it’s difficult to cram what’s going on into small bites.

I’m going to try a hybrid approach and run the newspaper image below as an advertisement. Hopefully it will shock consumers into action. If you’d like to contribute to the ad campaign, feel free to use the front page of Stenonymous.com to donate.

Feel free to spread these images if you think there’s somewhere they belong. I’m only one person. I can only post so much. There are like 30,000 of you.

Cartoon commissioned by Stenonymous.com to stop corporate fraud in court reporting by the Speech-to-Text Institute
Cartoon commissioned by Stenonymous.com to warn consumers about digital court reporter training by BlueLedge. DCRs have less career mobility/flexibility.
Satire created by Stenonymous.com to explain the likely outcome of corporate fraud in court reporting, which goes unabated thanks to government’s failure to enforce existing law, including the FTC and New York Attorney General.

Pre-Launch: Stenonymous’s Project Phoenix

By my estimates there are 20,000 freelancers and 28,000 court reporters total in this country. We do not receive much formal legal education beyond the terminology we might hear. This has left many of us confused on our legal rights. Even the agencies that hire us, schools that train us, and the members of the bench and bar we work with every day lack basic information about important concepts we are dealing with. This puts court reporters at a serious competitive disadvantage against anyone with the funds to hire a lawyer.

It’s time for change. If you are ready for that change, please take some time to answer this 8-question survey. I encourage you to share it with anyone you feel might answer it honestly. Every single honest answer will pave the way for taking this from concept to execution. This survey allows me to gauge interest and expand the project. I will release more information as soon as it is appropriate and safe to do so.

We must keep recruiting and sharing information. But I would like to remind everyone to take care of yourself this holiday season. If the stenographic newswire or some other issue is causing you to feel down, take care of yourself. Try to reach out to a support system. Humans are communal. You are not bad, wrong, or alone. You are human. You will be okay because all feelings change over time.

A very special thank you to every single one of my readers. Your readership has made this moment possible. Let me just note that Sound Professionals’ Chris Carfagno has let me know about their latest product announcement. I have always heard good things about SP; I have a great impression of Chris and have no problem recommending them. I will state that I do not believe I’ve personally used their products. When I used to use audio, I think I was using a mic sold by Stenograph at the time, which probably explains why I don’t use audio anymore. I have also started transitioning to Eclipse in honor of the Stenograph boycott. It feels great to be learning new skills and technology in my field and I would encourage every single reporter in the industry to give it a try. Eclipse provides robust training resources on top of its Anytime Support. I even had to call them recently (weekday, business hours), and they returned my call in under three minutes. Switching isn’t easy, but Eclipse has done all it can to make my transition pleasant. I have a feeling that once I am done, I will be able to honestly tell readers which software I prefer from a performance standpoint. Stay tuned.

PS. Stenograph reached out to the Texas Court Reporters Association board. My understanding is that there will be a future meeting in 2022 where members will be allowed to ask questions. This is why I called for the boycott. The more pressure we apply, the more urgent it is for them to curry favor with our associations and make us happy. It would make me personally happy if Stenograph acknowledged that digital court reporting will likely hurt minority speakers’ transcript accuracy. I give my word that if Stenograph makes such an acknowledgment, I will call off the boycott. Until then, let’s see how far those revenues can fall for 2022 and 2023 renewals as people continue canceling support. This profession will endure. Stenograph’s endurance relies upon its service to this profession.