It’s a holiday, so I’m not going to take up too much of your time. NCRA Members are being encouraged by former Strong members to stand up against what has been done. I’m in full support, so these materials have a home here. I regret no longer having my membership. But just let it be known that I’d be first to sign.
Spread ’em around to fellow NCRA members. If nothing else, it’ll be interesting to see how the institutional machinery attempts to wiggle out of this one.
Years ago I would’ve wept at the sight of such division. Now I consider it wholly necessary for the advancement of our interests as a community. NCRA needs to understand — and needs to communicate that it understands — that it exists to serve our interests. The mission in the bylaws is leadership and enlightenment. Real leaders don’t toss away their strongest supporters.
I will post without commentary this time*. These words are from Sue Terry and posted with permission as given in the post itself.
As posted to the Steno Intelligence Facebook Group
Good morning, everyone. I indicated that I would respond on the weekend regarding the recent decision that the NCRA Strong Committee would cease to exist.
It’s a bit perplexing to us to hear that we will soon have increased advocacy working for us, as Keith has indicated, particularly at a time when the budget is so lean and the Strong Committee has been self-funding our activities, as you will see in the list of activities below. But we will as members anxiously await the announcement of those plans just like all of you.
I’m only active in a few Facebook groups, and you can feel free to copy/paste my words in other groups you may belong to.
I want to thank everyone for the support you’ve given the Strong Committee through many years, and for your texts, messages, calls, events we’ve shared with you, etc. While it has been a lot of work for all of us on Strong, it’s been well worth the additional friendships we’ve made through our service.
As I just posted on the Leaders listserv, the Strong Committee’s work has always been rooted in integrity and commitment to the NCRA membership, and more importantly, to our professional colleagues. I think you can see if you take time to view just some of our work below, it has never been about personal gain or agenda. I think any organization would be happy to have volunteers like this, but apparently there’s something much better coming than we’ve been offering.
While we are quite saddened at this development, we fully intend to regroup, of course, and will now support our beloved profession outside the walls of the association to the best of our ability.
We don’t know yet what that’s going to look like, but we don’t sit and wring our hands much. And there’s likely some of our competitors thinking this is a good kind of dream; well, think again. We are now free of constraints and will be able to push information out with a little more agility than in the past. We are Free.
I’d like to recap some of what our committee has achieved for you through the last couple of years. It’s by no means an exhaustive list since none of us kept a running list, but I think you’ll see we’ve done our job as unpaid volunteers. And just remember, “Strong” has never been about the name, it’s about the people and the advocacy.
Here is a rundown of what we’ve contributed in recent memory:
Most recent this week that was a fantastic experience:
*Joining ABA as an interested member to get their emails, offerings and what’s happening in their world. Several days ago, our committee members attended a webinar on AI in the justice system that the ABA gave. Imagine this: they acknowledged the presence of so many court reporters during the meeting, and their valuable input was welcomed. I have also watched all of their “free” bar continuing education webinars on AI/courts. So much information to share in due time.
Elevator Pitches for members.
Keeping members informed about ABA Resolutions and Guidelines.
In 2019 or early ‘20, suggested an AI Bill of Rights or Disclosure Bill, to require disclosure if a transcript was processed with ASR. (We are excited to see it’s now finally on the table.)
Supported members with information to combat a proposed push requesting federal judges to electronically record more of their trials.
Compiled a database of every state bar association to enable flow of information.
The NCRA White Paper has been cited by CNBC, Reuters, NextGov, and others.
Channel 2 Dayton news story with Kristin and I regarding the NCRA White Paper and dangers to the justice system posed by AI.
State flyers.
Video series on YouTube channel for members to use, all captioned by Strong.
Letter to US Senate Judiciary Committee for a hearing on AI use in judicial systems nationwide.
Letters to Indiana, both personal and on behalf of Strong.
Letters to Tennessee, both personal and on behalf of Strong.
Letters to Washington on sunsetting, personal and on behalf of Strong.
Other Presentations and Tasks:
Montana Bar Association.
Colorado CRA.
Zoom webinars during Pandemic to move to remote.
Quarterly articles in Journal and often in the Weekly.
Privacy webinar.
Created other webinars for the NCRA store.
Drafted NCRA Resolution which was released ahead of the American Bar Association, who then adopted their own similar resolution.
Stenopalooza.
Spring Fling.
Powerpoints created for member use.
Powerpoints created for board use to present Strong.
Updated the Tech Powerpoint the board gives at their request.
Lisa Mig drove to Sue’s to do a mini-boot camp for Texas leaders (4-hour drive each way)
Lisa Mig drove to Kim Falgiani’s, 7-hour trip each way involving an overnight hotel stay to appear with Kim for a TV interview on AI dangers in broadcast captioning and courts.
Remote and in-person presentations for Steno in the City.
Ilinois Bar Presentation to their Board of Governors (Phyllis).
San Francisco Legal Professionals
presentation at their request.
Washington Court Reporters Association presentation.
Ohio (‘21, ‘22, ‘23 and ‘24)
State Leaders Webinar on Strong Education.
Oregon Court Reporters Association presentation.
CALDRA presentation.
California Court Reporters Association presentation.
Steno in the City presentation.
NCSA meeting in Las Vegas presentation.
NCRA Convention in Orlando presentation.
Utah CRA.
Massachusetts Court Reporters Association.
Provided assistance/brainstorming Zoom sessions/letters – Arizona, Texas, Indiana (before they dissolved the association,) Illinois,
Connecticut, Minnesota, Tennessee, Nebraska preparing for elimination of jobs and raise issues.
Alaska presentation.
Many one-on-one calls for support by all the Strong team, requiring additional evenings, weekends.
Youtube video series of judges/court admins, audio forensic expert, privacy and captioning all videos.
Series of meetings with privacy expert.
Captioned the Murdaugh FTR trial clip.
Phyllis worked with “Free” audio forensic, former FBI experts, Doug Lacey and Bruce Koenig (Bek Tek LLC), who contributed to some of our self-education, work and white paper.
Work with audio forensic expert, Ed Primeau, to produce videos on alterations
Ohio Supreme Court.
Stenocat Users Network seminars.
Each Strong member spent at least four hours a week doing research, and then met every other
Sunday evening for 2-4 hours to discuss research, projects, requests, strategies, etc., upcoming articles, and a few invited guests when needed.
Liz and I as Strong worked with Max Curry in the revamp of NCSA by digging into our own old files to reinvent the history of NCSA, which was obliterated by a previous CEO, along with many of the historical documents where members could go to archives and educate themselves on the path and history of the association.
Expenditures off the top of my head by our Strong Committee out of pocket:
Software to caption our own videos and some
of NCRA’s videos $225.00 a year, two years now.
Software for live polls during webinars $210 year, two years now.
Joined IAPP (International Association of Privacy Professionals and signed up for their privacy bar emails, and that’s where much of the AI bills information and charts that I’ve forwarded to states comes from, three years of dues for that at $250 a year.
Attended Legalweek in NY (Registration, Air, Hotel, etc., cost of approximately $2,000 and also gave a full report of that experience and threats to our livlihoods and the major players threatening us to the board in a written report.)
Attended multiple court technology conferences to be able to ask pertinent questions of court recording vendors during presentations, and that’s been multiple members of Strong when the technology conferences are near them.
Boot Camp – Stacey Raikes and I both paid our own air and hotel for Boot Camp at a dent to our personal budgets of another approximately $2,000.00 each and additional days off calendar.
When we were provided a booth at our annual conference to meet and greet with members. Stacey bought a monitor to have at our booth for streaming the videos we had produced for all of you, and also provided snacks we passed out, and a life-sized cutout for “Strong selfies” for members. She wouldn’t share how much she spent or let us contribute.
Court Technology Conference this past year: NCRA did provide a table for us at CTC, and it was a very costly spot. We much appreciated that expenditure. In addition to their expenditure, Debbie, Stacey and I also funded our own air travel and took vacation days from our work schedules to man the booth, stocked the booth with candies and goodies, and also outfitted the best-looking booth there, complete with banners, etc., all paid for by us (Debbie mostly on this one). I’ve been to a lot of court technology shows, but our booth at this one was one of the most popular and we were handing out our information constantly due to our focus on AI with our tag line of “Can You Trust AI Beyond a Reasonable Doubt?” I do hope the new people are going to self-fund at the level we did, considering the reported budget shortfalls.
In closing, thanks for the many messages of thanks of support we’ve received this week, along with offers to help. Thanks to Kimberly D’Urso and Kelly Bryce Shainline for your support, too. It means a lot coming from two great leaders. Please, friends, keep your states strong (pun intended) at this pivotal point in our profession and do what you feel is necessary to urge – no, demand – that the organization that has been so crucial to our justice system continues to fight for us. If you don’t belong to your state association, please join today. If you can afford it, join a neighboring one, too. Lets, please, please, please, keep our state associations strong. Membership deserves nothing less. Business as usual shouldn’t be an option for any of us. Our profession deserves everyone’s best efforts.
Sue
————-
Back to Chris Day.
Perhaps I will make one comment.
This is how the National Court Reporters Association treats its most fervent volunteers. People admittedly willing to spend thousands of dollars of their own money for a greater good and spreading awareness to the world about the research we’ve done.
How much do you think it respects you for your membership dues?
How much do you think it respects non-members of the profession?
It’s likely a simple calculation. The vendors want AI. They’re going AI. NCRA can’t have a committee making so much ground on AI awareness. We’re talking more media and legal profession attention than I could’ve dreamed. Look at Sue’s list again.
Those vendors are more important than the truth.
Those vendors are more important than your jobs.
What’re you going to do about it?
It’s time for a new national association. And if you like that idea, stay tuned for updates later in the year.
*The asterisk represents a liepushed for dramatic effect.
——-
P.S.
So it came to be that everyone could see what I see.
The headline is more or less the post. It’s come to my attention that the National Court Reporters Association will be discontinuing the NCRA Strong task force, later known as the NCRA Strong committee.
NCRA Strong was working on a great many things including gathering information about digital and AI failures. And from my own time there, I can honestly say that we were hamstrung every single step of the way by NCRA’s administration and organization. There were always excuses as to why things couldn’t, wouldn’t, or shouldn’t be done. They mothballed our white paper up until I published that they had mothballed the white paper and then quietly discontinued the committee within a year or so after. What an outrageous thing to do.
This marks a turning point in NCRA’s ethos. We should leave it in the dust bin where it belongs and form a new national association. If you haven’t dropped your membership yet, here’s your sign.
Always remember that the association was able to address the lies promoted by the Speech-to-Text Institute. It instead let independent publishers and activists like myself hang in the wind. The Speech-to-Text Institute, after being accused of fraud, quietly shut down its website in 2023.
And what a coincidence that NCRA Strong members validated some of my work indirectly and they’re now being disbanded. Some will blame Keith Lemons. Some will blame Dave Wenhold. Whatever the case, the National Court Reporters Association has indelibly proven itself to be an entity that does more harm than good by giving volunteers the feeling that they are doing good while quietly snuffing out anything that actually does good. It’s a political play that I can see a mile away, and I’m hopeful my fellow court reporters do too. We are being sabotaged and the knives have finally come out.
There’s some rumor of a new replacement committee. What does that accomplish? Pushing the people that have been doing this for years out of the seat for people that can be coached and directed easier.
I have a message from someone close to my heart. Go rogue. Get shit done.
The NCRA has enlisted the help of Farragut Partners. I wish them well. This could be a big turning point in terms of the advocacy we’ve seen from the organization.
In time, I may even be willing to say that I was wrong.
………
But then again, perhaps not, because certainly nobody that’s ever fucked me has ever expressed that they were wrong or that what they did to me was wrong. I was kind of thrown a bone, but nobody told me about it, I just kind of had to discover it myself. That’s like someone writing a sorry note and leaving it in the park where they know I walk occasionally.
We give to this entity because we associate it with good feelings and unity. I gave thousands of dollars and uncounted hours. If I could go back and undo that, I wouldn’t. That’s how strong those feelings are. The darker side of that is the ostracizing and othering of people that have been burned by the entity. I can only turn to my own experience. I was, at one time, guilty of that othering, guilty of believing that those that spoke against the organization were fostering division that would hurt our profession.
I have learned that I was wrong. Those people have a dedication to our craft and the students we mentor that transcends organizational loyalty.
Organizational loyalty in place of loyalty to our fellow reporters is a disease. It excludes the possibility of meaningful reform and/or the building of new organizations flexible enough to meet modern challenges. Would you keep grandpa on life support if it meant sacrificing your son?
Here I am in control of the premier alternative publication for the court reporting industry. All I can say is that if I grow with your help, I’ll remember those good feelings. If I grow despite your othering, I’ll remember that too.
Stenonymous releases monthly readership stats as of March 23, 2024.
P.S.
I heard there may be a judge in California reviewing my work. Should you find yourself arriving on this page ever, just know that I have spent years documenting what I’ve documented, I would testify to the things that can be testified to, and the situation is so deleterious to the health of the fraudster corporations that they have allowed me to publish unabated in my own name well beyond the statute of limitations for defamation even after I personally alerted them that I was doing what I was doing. Of course, I submit this is because what I’ve written is true.
I made myself so obnoxious that if the matter ever does reach a courtroom, the morons will have to explain why they harass court reporters for what they put on Facebook while letting me do this for years and years. The U.S. Legal reps will have their blatant sexism and bullying of women dragged out into the light.
But I still fear for this country. Many people have asked why SBF and others are able to get away with the things that they get away with for so long.
As it turns out, a 14-year professional in a field can document and publish extensively about a fraud being committed, including passing information to law enforcement and journalists, and nothing will be done.
Nothing.
For years.
On an issue impacting tens of thousands of people.
(NOTE 1: Reading time is extended by the text preserved at the end of this writeup. The writeup is short-ish.)
(NOTE 2: I am told by several readers the first link is not working for them. I am not sure how to fix this. It was working for me last I checked on 2/13/24.)
A public post by Angela Sidener came to my attention. Though the post was made during National Court Reporters Association’s Court Reporting & Captioning Week 2024, the events described therein occurred at the organization’s Legislative Boot Camp 2023 (herein LBC), before my announced resignation from the National Court Reporters Association in August 2023.
In brief, NCRA’s LBC, though I have never attended, is a taste of lobbying and learning about the legislative process, particularly of the federal government. Many, many court reporters are ignorant with regard to how laws are passed, and the education truly is vital to our field.
But something reportedly happened that day. Disgraced Congressman Ed Whitfield was invited to speak, and therein he minimized the events of the January 6th occupation of the capitol by over 2,000 “mostly peaceful” protestors, also known as rioters. The event was referred to as a “demonstration” by Mr. Whitfield.
At this point, I have to say, NCRA has always portrayed itself as non-partisan to a fault. It avoids controversial topics even where the law and science is completely on the side of working court reporters. So to learn that very partisan viewpoints made their way into the Legislative Boot Camp is pretty disheartening. There are also allegations that NCRA Executive Director Dave Wenhold made a comment about Obama being against free speech. Being something of a free speech absolutist myself, I don’t fault him if that’s a genuine belief. But that’s not, in my view, in line with the whole “we are a non-partisan organization” thing if true. Most politicians are against free speech if it brings them closer to a goal.
Sidener goes on to mention NCRA’s freelance lean. And this is unreservedly true. We have been watching officialships get eaten up by Steve Townsend and the digital brigade for years. How interesting is it that for years, and years, and years we repeated the mantra “realtime is the future,” putting all our eggs into a single basket of the high-priced, low volume specialty? The idea of business diversification eluded all of the major players for well over half a decade, and that includes Wenhold, Stenograph, and beyond. In Stenograph’s case, the organization figured out what diversification was as soon as Anir Dutta took the helm and made friends with the STTI Bloc. Or they knew damn well and funneled all the eggs into one basket anyway. Choose one.
The ultimate result of failing to fight for officials and leaving it to the state associations to figure out, as Sidener writes, is criminal court reporters crushed under the weight of their dockets. In my view, this will lead to more criminal matters rolling over to audio and digital court reporting, which has turnaround time issues and sometimes results in the record being lost, appeals being denied, or expensive reconstruction hearings. Through its “non-partisan” habitual inaction, NCRA indeed chooses a side. It chooses to allow the indigent to be plagued by subpar record quality and serious privacy issues rather than stand up and shout that every person appearing in a legal proceeding in this country deserves the gold standard of stenographic court reporting. Because THAT would be political! This is an organization devoted to stenographers, by the way. It shouldn’t be a hard choice.
Perhaps it is time for the NCRA Board to consider a change in leadership. As I mentioned in my corruption post, we do not have to keep using people from the association management industry. We can send stenographers to association management training. It’s become painfully clear to me that we need an executive director that has done what we do. We can no longer afford to have the staff wag the dog and glide by on pure charisma. We need results. And if the NCRA can’t deliver, it needs to dissolve.
National Court Reporters Association, the Association for Court Reporters and Captioners
———
Text preserved:
National Con Reporters & Captioners[sic] Week 2024
TLDR; I finally gave up my RPR and professional association. 😊
Many of my colleagues and friends are celebrating the court reporting profession this week. Unfortunately, this year I’m not joining in the festivities, even though the last two years I was responsible for getting Gov. Inslee to declare Court Reporting and Captioning Week statewide in an official proclamation.
A few things last year opened my eyes wide. I’m grateful and truly thankful for this experience and for those who have supported me. We organize for a better future.
In February 2023, I went to Washington, D.C., as vice president of my state court reporters association for a national legislative boot camp. I was excited for the mentorship opportunity, networking with colleagues, and meeting with legislators again. I caught a red-eye Friday night, Washington state to Washington, D.C., because, as an official reporter in superior court, I had a docket to cover. I work a full-time+ job in addition to all my volunteer activities, so my schedule was tight, but I was excited.
As a preface, I’m experienced in the nuances of politics, pay attention to current events, and have butted heads with the national organization on a few occasions over the years, but I was a loyal member. I disagreed with their anti-worker agenda that urged members to advocate against the PRO Act, various other pieces of independent contractor legislation they’ve opposed in the past, so I’m always weary of their politicking and pay close attention.
What I experienced at boot camp, and the aftermath, shook my world, both personally and professionally. There’s probably 60 people in attendance. Reading the room, I knew this wasn’t the most politically active crowd when they were impressed with the School House Rocks video on how to pass a bill. I noticed no one batted an eye when the national executive director was bragging about his role in suing the government, Citizens United, the most destructive ruling regarding money in politics in our Supreme Court history, telling the crowd President Obama was against free speech. Cringe.
To spare more details, I’m jumping right to the line crossed. Monday morning, a supposed impromptu speaker was introduced. Never mind the brag his sidekick quipped while introducing him about being from the home of Kevin McCarthy, fist pump, (cringe), they brought disgraced former Congressman Ed Whitfield, Republican from Kentucky that was forced to resign over ethics violations, to the mic to gaslight the crowd about January 6th and Democrats stealing elections. That’s all he talked about. He had nothing to add to our agenda, nothing to say about court reporting. This was a violation of our professional Code of Ethics, clearly extreme right-wing politicking at a nonpartisan organization’s event.
I was livid, but I sat in silence, only offering the word “insurrection” twice when Mr. Whitfield was stuttering around, trying to find what to call an attempted coup we all watched on TV. He settled on calling it a demonstration. I was texting my sister in shock. She advised I get up and leave, but I was there representing my state and I was fearful to make a scene. As he finished gaslighting, the entire room applauded, but me. Leadership gathered around him to shake hands and were all smiles and pictures. I looked around, still in shock, and said to my table, “I cannot believe NCRA gave that nazzzi a platform.”
A few in my group said, “Shhhh, you can’t be political here.” My eyes popped as I realized they must not have understood a word he was saying. (In full disclosure, I lived in Richmond when the nazzzi’s marched in Charlottesville in 2017, killed Heather Heyer, and they are politically active on the east coast as well as here in Spokane and Idaho, but maybe I should have said fascist? Big diff?)
I said, “I didn’t bring it up. He just gaslit this entire crowd. January 6th was an attack on our sitting government, not a demonstration. A confederate flag was flown in our Capitol building for the first time, and there’s African-Americans here,” like, “What?” End of discussion, I get up and walk out for the break.
I immediately meet up with a colleague and expressed my shock, disgust, and feelings of leaving immediately. She said she was surprised too and that someone from California at her table shared the same WTF comments, but they still all clapped along at the end. This was the last day before Hill Day, so I decided to stick with my group and keep my mouth shut about the incident. We all got along fine in our skits, discussion afterwards, and there wasn’t any drama. We also all chatted in group texts. There was no scene.
Hill Day comes and it’s an amazing day. My colleague and I scrap the 12-hour schedule given to us and just visit our reps and take in the experience. I had to fly back early to get back to work Wednesday, but we were able to catch some amazing events going on around The Hill. There was a large demonstration outside SCOTUS for student debt relief, Equal Rights Amendment demonstrations were happening, and we were able to listen in as other lobbyists met with our legislators. I have stories, but I won’t digress here. It was an amazing day brushing elbows in one of my favorite places.
I get home and try to process this experience after I’d gotten rest and wasn’t jetlagged. I’d been in communication with two members of the national association back in my state and shared what happened. They were shocked and expressed outrage they were told there was no room for them to speak, the NCRA STRONG committee, but they gave time to Mr. Whitfield. One was on our state legislative committee and the other was serving on the national board of directors. The director took my concerns to a meeting where it was discussed and decided no action would be taken to apologize to attendees for the lapse in ethical judgement that allowed such a presentation, nor would they make a statement in firm support of democracy, free and fair elections, just basic non-partisan American values.
On top of my full-time+ job and board service, committee assignments, I was also in the middle of teaching a national Intro to Steno A to Z program with active participants I’d recruited and mentored. I didn’t want to let them down with an immediate resignation, so I swept my personal feelings aside to get through this 6-week program. After it ended, I emailed the national board myself, as a dues-paying member, and asked for them to recognize Mr. Whitfield did not speak for the association, nor our values. I also asked how much of national’s money was paid to his lobbying firm, Farragut Group, to make these phone calls to set up our meetings. Simple requests, I thought.
The president of the association wrote me back. Nobody else on the board responded. The president’s response was a pathetic attempt at acknowledging the damage done and covering for the association, saying they were all shocked by his speech, and their executive director did bring it up and got an apology for Mr. Whitfield’s comments; it certainly won’t happen again, but . . . they wouldn’t be passing that apology along to those in attendance. It’s best if we just shhhh. I’ll attach my correspondence with the national president in the comments here for full disclosure.
After long and hard consideration, conversations with people I respect, I gave up my membership. It was hard!!! I gave up the initials I’d paid for, tested out, and earned because I’m ashamed and embarrassed to belong to such an organization. My friends and I joke about what those initials really stand for: National Corporate Reporters Association? National Con Reporters Association? National Clueless Reporters Association? If you attend their meetings, they’re actively anti-union and like to book venues for conventions without union representation for their events.
I’ve worked in the courts and covered the criminal docket. It’s THE most important work done on a daily basis, bar none. It’s the record on which appeals happen, laws are affirmed, challenged, and reviewed. It’s a court reporter’s job to make sure that record is preserved. I hope none of you ever find yourself in a seat as a victim or defendant in a courtroom with a clerk pushing a recording button, outsourcing transcribing to noncertified court reporters in a certification-required state. The joke is national and state organizations have let digital recorders come into the courts, and it’s okay with them if a digital recorder replaces an official reporter.
Out of 39 counties in Washington, only 13 jurisdictions have official reporters left, and they’re mostly understaffed, many retiring. This is a certification required state! I pay for a state license to do my job here. King County, which is Seattle, has only 3 to 4 official reporters for their entire superior court bench. Look up how many judges they have. Those officials left are struggling with the weight of their dockets. Many court admins keep reporters in trial/on the record M-F and mandate we do all our transcript work on nights, weekends, and vacations. Fact. I have that in writing from Spokane County court administration.
National, and many state organizations by proxy, are “fighting” to keep the digital recorders out of their deposition rooms and freelance field only. That’s where the money is made. Criminal indigent work is the lowest pay, and they don’t want to do it. But people’s liberty interests are at stake! No bigger threat in life than your loss of liberty. We’re “court” reporters, not “deposition” reporters, but national and state associations never seem to be able to organize to benefit working reporters and keep courts staffed to have an impartial, skilled guardian of the record writing and filing that transcript.
In my experience volunteering, outside of testing, which seems to be their loss-leader to maintain membership dues, national’s priority is big-box firm owners either chomping at the bit to or actively abusing the independent contractor laws. I witnessed it for years and pushed back, made many friends doing so. Hours of meetings and hundreds of emails voicing frustration at their misinformation and fear-mongering, the organization purposefully keeping reporters ignorant of their rights, advancements in technology, and current laws being made that affect our industry.
I resigned my membership after losing all trust and respect for the association. This machine fights fascism.
RIP RPR
#CRCW2024 #RIPRPR961249
Images attached:
Letter to the National Court Reporters Association from Angela Sidener over platforming of insurrection apologist and disgraced former congressman Ed Whitfield.Response from then-NCRA President Jason Meadors to Angela Sidener over the platforming of insurrection apologist and disgraced former congressman Ed WhitfieldReply to the then-NCRA President from Angela Sidener over the platforming of insurrection apologist and disgraced former congressman Ed Whitfield
On Thursday the Onondaga Criminal Court arraignments had a surprise visit from the embattled z-list court reporting personality, X, formerly known as George Santos. Santos, having been charged with being too compliant with police officers, was discovered to be a stenographer just shortly into the proceeding.
Stenonymous publishes “real” court transcript for creative writing exercise.
After the reveal, Mr. Santos was asked by the Court to relieve the official court reporter taking the proceedings. Mr. Santos allegedly turned to her, smiled, and said, “don’t worry, I got this. I’m the NCRA Fastest Fingers Award Winner of 2023. Elon Musk is going to buy you a horse for your trouble.”
Once Santos was behind the keys of the stenotype, the rest of it went well for him. In the transcript obtained by Court Tee Vee, an unprecedented situation unfolded.
THE COURT: Well, Mr. Santos, it seems there’s been a mistake. Your lawyer, Mr. Richards, has pointed out that the accusatory instrument has a fatal defect. The case is dismissed and sealed.
THE PROSECUTOR: Oh, Mr. Santos, we are so, so sorry for our malicious prosecution. Please don’t use the transcript of this proceeding to sue us.
MR. RICHARDS: My client is a benevolent and understanding person. In addition to being the first man to the moon and the only person to single handedly save an entire school bus of children with his left pinky, he donated enough to charity to end world hunger and eliminated unemployment worldwide. There’s no reason for him to sue you, and your apology is humbly accepted.
THE COURT: By the way, Mr. Santos, thank you for ending the court reporter shortage fraud by creating a controversy so obnoxious that there isn’t a single person that hasn’t heard of stenography. That was a bold move, and it really paid off for your profession, they should be proud.
THE DEFENDANT: Your Honor, it was no trouble. The court reporters living here and working every day to make this county shine, they’re the real heroes.
(Whereupon, court officers and court clerks all broke into tears as the sun shone through an open window and a beam of light cast a spotlight on X, formerly known as George Santos. As he exited the courtroom, a flock of doves carrying the mice from Cinderella fluttered through the window and dropped their furry friends, and everyone left the courtroom while singing We All Lift Together from the worldwide critically acclaimed MMORPG Warframe. Yes, including the mice and doves.)
Critics question the parenthetical at the end. Court officers, known for their professionalism, helpfulness, and dedication to the safety of courthouses, and clerks, also known for their professionalism and dedication to the just and fair operation of courthouses, simply don’t do that kind of thing. A source speaking on the condition of anonymity stated that in reality, the relieved stenographer was actually 1,567% more qualified than Santos, so we’re not really sure what occurred that day.
Breaking news. Check back for more updates.
*None of this is real. It’s part of Stenonymous Whatever I Want Weekends, a thing I just made up for when I want to do something different like this parody of so many flavors. According to a source that wishes to remain anonymous, in the incident this was based on, the erroneously-charged case was dismissed and sealed 14 days after arraignment. The source believes that a small percentage of our field does not understand the gravity of our work and how it can impact people’s lives, and that by making this excerpt and attached writing exercise public, we can all be reminded that anyone can be charged with anything, and that treating all lawyers, litigants, and the public equally is imperative. “It could be any of us one day,” he said.
Thanks again, Anonymous. I share these beliefs, but even if I didn’t, I’d probably have published anyway for the literary and conceptual value.
From Anonymous and myself, thank you for making this profession shine every day with your hard work and dedication.
The National Court Reporters Association released a white paper, Emerging Ethical and Legal Issues Related to the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), Voice Cloning, and Digital Audio Recording of Legal Proceedings.
There was a past blog post complaining about how I felt my work on this white paper was mothballed. I suppose I have to retract that now that it’s been released.
Thank you to everyone that took part in drafting the white paper. It’s something I submitted quite a lot to during my time in STRONG and was very important to me.
Contributors to the NCRA November 2023 White Paper
P.S. for anyone that follows the social media antics, I lost way worse than I thought I was going to, so I’m going to keep this one brief 😂.
The National Court Reporters Association announced that testing procedures will now be a self-launched/self-authenticated process. I suspect this is a good thing. From my talks with people over the years and even slightly from my own experience I could see the pitfalls of the old way. Proctors were people given general training to administer general tests, and our testing process was reportedly facing problems because proctors were disconnecting or making unreasonable demands.
This doesn’t give you license to cheat though. Security issues are still going to be flagged and sent to NCRA for review.
I’m happy the NCRA’s responsiveness to members is going up. I wonder what “precipitated” that…
A Stenonymous source came through for me on something the National Court Reporters Association is doing to prevent the sunset of the Tennessee Board of Court Reporting. Advocacy Center link went out. Sample letter and phone call templates were released for those that want to spend the time standing up for standards in court reporting. Get ‘em from your state leaders.
National Court Reporters Association responds to the attempted sunset of the Tennessee Board of Court Reporting.
There were also posts on social media about organizing.
Just for the sake of completeness, the sample letter in my possession is available for download.
I don’t always have good things to say about the National Court Reporters Association, but I will say that their responsiveness to state issues has been much better than it was once rumored to be. One New York source, for example, said that many years ago, the source called about New York cutting Workers Comp reporters, and that person was reportedly told that it was a state issue and that they’re federal. That basically meant “not our problem, deal with it.”
Let’s just say that if that line of logic existed in the NCRA ethos, it doesn’t seem to anymore. The organization has taken steps to become more supportive of state issues. Indiana was one example I can recall off the top of my head as of writing. I’ve said it online before, we need to decide if we want a profession or a club. If NCRA keeps on this path of responsiveness and communication, it’s a good sign we want to be a profession. It’s a good chance we’ll succeed.
My only real gripe is it took a couple of hours for this information to be leaked to me despite having so many Stenonymous sources…
Likely due to member pressure for a more transparent National Court Reporters Association and internet backlash, the NCRA’s holding a meeting on August 29th. Interested members can attend by using the Learning Center link.
I do point to the little jab at social media negativity at the bottom though. I would agree that it’s unfortunate that we have to start trashing the organization for it to pay attention, but here we are. Please don’t treat us like we’re the problem. We’re a symptom of something past administrations were ignorant about or willfully ignored. Again, that is not Kristin Anderson’s fault. Stenonymous sources report high hopes for this presidency. I have high hopes too. But please understand it’s simple math, the more deaf the organization, the less likely we’ll be shamed into silence because of our ostensibly improper “negativity.”
I also genuinely agree with the part about respecting the space. Don’t disrespect people at their own meetings. Though I won’t be in attendance, I’m happy to publish members’ statements about it. In my view, meetings like this are a time to open dialogue and connection. Try your best at that. You can always media bash later if something is really eating at you. After all, you have the stenographic free press on your side.
National Court Reporters Association to hold first Members Matter Meeting August 2023National Court Reporters Association to hold first Members Matter Meeting August 2023National Court Reporters Association to hold first Members Matter Meeting August 2023
In a world where regular journalists are afraid to cover actual news, I suspect citizen journalists are going to fill the gaps. Don’t let anyone mislead you into believing our field’s news is not important. Court officials in some parts of the country have said outright that we’re integral to democracy. The largest threat to guardians of the record and the accuracy of court records was a corporate play that the government and pretty much anybody with power to help sat back and watched happen.
Don’t let anyone fool you into believing we do not need a media arm for this profession. Have you ever noticed that anything that wants to remain relevant has a media arm? The various sports, Congress, movies & Hollywood, music, video gaming, celebrities, milk. For years court reporter culture was about being quiet about who we are and what we make because people were scared the public would turn around and do away with us. Then the science came out that we were better than alternatives and still we can’t be bothered to muster up the courage to advertise this nationwide and bring back demand for stenographic jobs. There’s something very wrong there.
If you want to support budding free press for the court reporting industry, consider donating $5 today on the front page of Stenonymous.com for the 5+ years I’ve been publishing for our community. If you’re enjoying Stenonymous, you are not alone.
Stenonymous readership up after trend of declining views.